Page 285 - Improving Machinery Reliability
P. 285

256   Improving Machinery Reliability

                        The most recent studies reveal that about a third of the field process operators’
                      shift time is unstructured and available for tasks other than  attending to the
                      processes.
                      Reliability-oriented repairs. There have been  successes in improving reliability
                      through corrective actions proposed on a regular basis as part of routine mainte-
                      nance repair work. The mechanism depends on solid technical knowledge in the
                      craftsmen and supervisors in the routine maintenance corps and a readily available
                      maintenance engineering group for support as required. The aim is to make most
                      repairs permanent if feasible. The results of such a process in one particularly suc-
                      cessful refinery have eliminated recurring failures to an extent that far less repair
                      maintenance is required than in most refineries, and the routine maintenance costs
                      are among the lowest in the world.
                      The crew concept-a  future solution for productivity? Several refineries in the
                      world have decided to staff their facilities with a cadre of workers capable of both
                      operating and maintaining the equipment. This type of craftsman-operator has typ-
                      ically been developed by hiring persons with technical or craft skills and training
                      them to operate the processing units. Proficiency in maintenance and in operation
                      is established and maintained by a system of  rotation, and multi-craft skill devel-
                      opment is stressed. The refineries are willing to invest significantly in the develop-
                      ment of such persons. One such refiner has measured an average of over two main-
                      tenance skill levels per person in addition to the operator skills. The efficiency and
                      effectiveness afforded by their success is reflected in the significant fact that they
                      pay their crew 35% more than other refiners in the region, yet their total mainte-
                      nance outlay is 25% less than the next best refinery. There are several other signif-
                      icant rewards:
                        The crews carry out all preventive maintenance and  condition monitoring
                      schedules while on operating shift assignment.
                        Rather than assigning two persons to a maintenance job, those assigned to day-
                      shift process operations are scheduled to provide short-term assistance.
                        The crew on operating shift performs all preparations for equipment scheduled
                      for maintenance, including purging and draining, disassembly, and electrical lock-
                      out and disconnection.
                        This versatility has enabled those using the dual-function crew concept to record
                      up to 12% of the refinery’s total maintenance demand and reliability improvement
                      as being satisfied by  the crew members  while  on operating assignment.  This
                      approach to effectiveness cannot be universal. The attitudes of both the workforce
                      and management must be synchronized to the same standards of expectations, per-
                      formance, and job enjoyment.  But it may  be possible  for more refineries to
                      approach crew benefits if existing work-rule demarcations can be relaxed or modi-
                      fied. Solomon Associates has observed  a more willing acceptance for efficiency
                      improvement in the younger workers. They appear willing to have a try at learning
                      more than one skill, but may be confused by attitudes of their first-line supervisors
                      who matured in a single-skill era and may be unwittingly holding on to concepts
                      that do not support development of versatility.
   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290