Page 284 - Improving Machinery Reliability
P. 284

Maintenance and Benchmarking Reliability   255

                   e Accountability for reliability. Refiners who have achieved control of their facili-
                    ties’ performance  and reliability have  assigned individuals to be accountable for
                    success of the operating units. This accountability is assigned in writing and may
                    typically be included in three-to-five year operating plans. Such plans include the
                    maintenance and reliability  performance targets,  objectives, budgets, reliability
                    improvement spending for problem equipment, and the job performance expecta-
                    tions for each position in their organizations. Where accountability is absent, cost
                    effective, organized problem solving and results are seldom observed.

                   Organizational Style and Structure

                     Recent worldwide maintenance and reliability management analyses have provid-
                   ed insight into organizational issues that affect maintenance efficiency and reliability
                   effectiveness:

                    Maintenance cost-a  stewardship role for process operations. Processing is the
                    reason for the refinery to exist. It must have support from all other departments to
                    cany out plans formulated by the company’s management. In this sense, it is not
                    difficult to envision Process Operations as the custodian or “owner” of the process-
                    ing machinery and equipment in addition to the hydrocarbon streams they control
                    and direct. Furthermore,  because operating  assets are the sole source of  revenue
                    generation, it is similarly plausible to consider Process Operations as responsible for
                    the equipment’s  integrity, with maintenance and engineering in subsidiary roles.
                    This concept is gaining acceptance and has been seen to strengthen the review of
                    actual need of specific maintenance work and to stimulate operating personnel into
                    increased awareness of their roles as the eyes and ears of the operating equipment.
                    Maintenance organization structure. Solomon Associates has identified  eight
                    structural models that classify most existing organizations. These models are based
                    on how the maintenance group is departmentalized and where in the organization
                    resource consumption  is prioritized:  centrally  or distributed  to refinery  subdivi-
                    sions. The Management  Task model is characteristic  of  the best performers.  As
                    opposed to an organization by craft lines or by maintenance task type (mechanical,
                    civil, electrical), the Management Task model provides planning and systems, cen-
                    tral shops and stores services, and maintenance engineering departments to support
                    a work-execution  group. The better  performers are represented equally by  area
                    assignment and central assignment approaches to controlling the workforce, but all
                    employ centralized control of maintenance policy and work priority determination.
                    No organizations employing an operating area team or “business-unit” approach of
                    distributed maintenance are represented in the better performers group.
                   * Use of process operators. Several refineries have tapped  the resourcefulness  of
                    their process operators to contribute to reliability improvement and maintenance.
                    Recognizing that the always-present operating forces can be the first line of defense
                    against equipment failures, there refineries have provided training and motivation to
                    increase  the operators’  awareness  of  equipment  difficulties  and to perform  light
                    maintenance tasks which remove both the consumption of maintenance man-hours
                    and the administrative burden of processing the associated work orders.
   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289