Page 434 - Industrial Wastewater Treatment, Recycling and Reuse
P. 434

406   Industrial Wastewater Treatment, Recycling, and Reuse


          10.2.2 Treatment Cost for Various Technologies
          All these latest and advanced technologies employed in domestic wastewa-
          ter treatment are highly energy intensive due to the aeration demand for
          organic oxidation. The operating cost of aeration systems ranges from Rs.
                  3
          1to9/m , making them unviable options for future use. The treatment
          cost to produce effluent of a quality better than the Indian standard for dis-
          charge into water bodies (biological oxygen demand (BOD 5 )<30 mg/L,
          SS<30 mg/L) is different for different technologies. The WSP technology
                                                                     3
          has the lowest treatment cost and treats sewage at a cost of Rs. 1/m .The
          conventional ASP system has a moderate treatment cost and produces trea-
                                      3
          ted water at a cost of Rs. 3.5/m .The treatment costforan SBRsystemis
                  3
          Rs. 5/m . Similarly, among treatment options that produce effluents of
          recyclable quality (BOD 5 <5mg/L and SS<5 mg/L), ASP followed by
          sand filtration and carbon filtration has the lowest treatment cost, i.e.,
                    3
          Rs. 6.5/m while the MBR process generatestreated waterat acost of
                  3
          Rs. 9/m . The SBR system, followed by sand filtration and carbon
                                                            3
          filtration, produces treated water at a rate of Rs. 7.5/m .The operating
          cost of a UASB-based domestic sewage treatment system is in the range
                         3
          of Rs. 0.5–1/m . However, it is necessary to evaluate these on a case-
          by-case basis depending on the specific situation before arriving at a
          conclusion. The application of UASB technology is a good option for
          reducing the operating costs and enhancing energy generation from waste-
          water. However, there are multiple process and operational difficulties
          associated with the UASB system. There is no single solution for complete
          wastewater treatment and a downstream aeration system is required for
          complete treatment. UASB plants installed under various government
          schemes failed to deliver the desired discharge quality of effluent due to
          frequent operational failures. These failures occur because of maintenance
          of biomass in the reactors and frequent washouts. It is very important to
          maintain proper hydraulic conditions within UASB reactors. Upflow
          velocity and settling rates need to be balanced for efficient functioning
          of the bioreactor. Anaerobic microbial species are very sensitive to organic
          shock loads and temperature variations. In general, UASB technology
          demands more highly skilled operators compared with other aerobic
          wastewater treatment technologies.
             Considering the above facts, water and energy nexus have become crit-
          ical factors in developing efficient and sustainable technologies for sewage
          treatment. A need exists to develop technologies that can provide recyclable
          quality water with low-operating costs and a smaller footprint. The
   429   430   431   432   433   434   435   436   437   438   439