Page 90 - Inorganic Mass Spectrometry : Fundamentals and Applications
P. 90

80                                                          Olesik

            flows across  the  transducer  surface.  This  has  three  important  implications:   No
            turbulent  gas  is  needed  to  produce   the aerosol, so turbulence  induced  aerosol
            losses  and  droplet-droplet  coagulation  in  the  spray  chamber  should  be  reduced
            compared  to  those of pneumatic  nebulizers. The flow  rate of the gas  used to carry
            the  aerosol to the ICP can  be  optimized  independently of the aerosol  generation
            process.  Finally, there are  no small orifices to become  clogged.
                 Most  ultrasonic  nebulizers  use  a  somewhat  larger  sample  uptake  rate  (2-3
            ~/min) than  pneumatic  nebulizers.  Typically the spray  chamber  and/or  a  tube
            following  the  spray  chamber   is  heated  to  evaporate  water  partially  from the
            aerosol, Because the aerosol  transport  efficiency  is higher  when  an  ultrasonic
            nebulizer is used,  particularly  with  a  heated  spray  chamber,  a  system to remove
                                                           is
            solvent  (typically  a  condenser  and/or  membrane  separator) essential to prevent
            deleterious  cooling of  the ICP by excess  water.
                 The combination of  the  ultrasonic  nebulizer,  heated  spray  chamber  and
            condenser/desolvator leads to  improvements  in  detection  limits by  a factor of
            about 10 compared to that of a  pneumatic  nebulizer  without  a  desolvation  system.
            This is the  main  reason  ultrasonic  nebulizers  are  used  despite  their  higher  cost
            (approximately U.S.  $15,000 in  1998).
                 There are  several  drawbacks  to  ultrasonic  nebulizer/desolvation  systems.
            Precision is typically  somewhat poorer (1% to 3% relative standard  deviation)
            than  for pneumatic  nebulizers  (0.5% to  1.0%  relative  standard  deviation)  and
            washout  times  are  often  longer  (60 to 90 sec compared to 20 to 30 sec for a
            pneumatic  nebulizer/spray  chamber  without  desolvation).  Furthermore,  chemical
            matrix egects are  dependent  on  the  amount of concomitant  species  that enter the
            ICP per  second.  Therefore,  use of any  sample in~oduction device that increases
            the  amount of sample  entering  the  plasma  per  second  also  naturally  leads  to  more
            severe  matrix effects when  the sample contains high  concentrations of concomi-
            tant  species.
            ~esoiv~tio~ Systems

            Desolvation  systems  can  provide  three  potential  advantages for ICP-MS:  higher
            analyte  transport  efficiencies,  reduced  molecular  oxide  ion  signals,  and  reduced
            solvent  loading  of  the  plasma.  Two  different  approaches  have  been  used   for
            desolvation  in  ICP-MS.  The heated  spray  chamber/condenser  combination  has
            been  discussed; it is the most  commonly  used  system. The extent of evaporation of
            the solvent  from  the aerosol  and  cooling  to  reduce  vapor  loading  varies   from
            system  to  system.  The second  approach is the use of  a  membrane  separator  to
            remove  solvent  vapor  before it enters the ICP.

                 ~eate~ Spray C~a~~ers. The  use of a  heated  spray  chamber to evaporate
            the aerosol  partially leads to  reduction  in drop size and  therefore  higher  analyte
            transport  efficiencies.  Often  the  drying   of  the  aerosol  droplets  is  incomplete.
   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95