Page 345 - Integrated Wireless Propagation Models
P. 345

I n - B u i l d i n g   ( P i c o c e l l )   P r e d i c t i o n   M  o d e l s    323



                            Non-LOS comparison - end of  building
                    1 2 0                                   14

                    1 1 0                                   1 2
                                                                     �  K_M Non-LOS-0.15
                                                            10  co
                                                               ""0
                  co  1 0 0
                  ""0                                          .�    -- K_M Non-LOS-0.2
                                                               Q)
                  .�                                       8   (.)
                  en   90                                      c
                  en                                           �
                  _Q                                           Q)        Lee Non-LOS
                  ..c                                      6   ll=
                                                               '5
                  Cii
                  c...   80                                    X
                                                               ctl
                                                           4   :2:   --..-- Max difference
                     70                                    2
                     60                                    0
                         "
                              IX�   <o�   ,<t- �   "  reP   '];  �
                                                        �
                                  Distance in meter
               FIGURE 5.4.1.3  Comparison of the enhanced Lee and Keenan-Motley models-LOS. (A color
               version of this figure is available at www.mhprofessional.com/iwpm. )


                                                               I
               o f   the building than the Keenan-Motley model does.  t   i s   very important that the
               area in the middle of the building be a critical area in designing an in-building net­
               work system. The enhanced part of the Lee model also provides flexibility and easier
               integration.
                           1
                  Figure 5.4. . 3 compares the path loss of the end-of-building scenario. The difference
               in predictions between the two models grows apart as the distance increases. Again,
               this phenomenon comes back to remind us of the previous argument on the path loss
               that the change is too drastic with the linear attenuation factors in the Keenan-Motley
               model in the LOS situation.
                  As we can see from the above analysis, the enhancement of the Lee model provides
               an effective means to deal with two scenarios. One is the LOS scenario, which better
               addresses the LOS loss outside the close-in zone. The other is the introduction of addi­
               tional parameters that deal with the RF characteristics inside rooms.


               5.4.2  Ericsson  u ltiple-Breakpoint Model  E mpirical)
                               M
                                                        (
               The Ericsson in-building path-loss model is an empirical model and was established
               from measurements in one multiple-floor office building by Ericsson Radio system.43A4
               This model is used around 900 MHz. It takes four regions based on the different distances
               from the base station, as shown in Fig. 5.4.2.1 and Table 5.4.2.1.
                  Measurements have been made for a picocellular office system in a six-story modem
               building with a floor plan shown in Fig. 5.4.2.1. Nine fixed stations (FS) for 900 MHz
               and 14 (FS) per 1800 MHz on each floor are placed, as the x and o indicate respectively.
   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350