Page 59 - Intro Predictive Maintenance
P. 59

50       An Introduction to Predictive Maintenance

                 preventive maintenance tasks. This access will be required more often than
                 it is with breakdown-driven maintenance.  A good program requires the
                 support of production, with immediate notification of any potential prob-
                 lems and willingness to coordinate equipment availability for inspections
                 and necessary tasks.

         The reasons for and against doing preventive maintenance are summarized in the fol-
         lowing list. The disadvantages are most pronounced with fixed-interval maintenance
         tasks. Reactive and condition-monitoring tasks both emphasize the positive and reduce
         the negatives.

         Advantages

               • Performed when convenient
               • Increases equipment uptime
               • Creates maximum production revenue
               • Standardizes procedures, times, and costs
               • Minimizes parts inventory
               • Cuts overtime
               • Balances workload
               • Reduces need for standby equipment
               • Improves safety and pollution control
               • Facilitates packaging tasks and contracts
               • Schedules resources on hand
               • Stimulates pre-action instead of reaction
               • Indicates support to user
               • Assures consistent quality
               • Promotes benefit/cost optimization

         Disadvantages
               • Exposes equipment to possible damage
               • Failures in new parts
               • Uses more parts
               • Increases initial costs
               • Requires more frequent access to equipment



         3.3 DESIGNING A PREDICTIVE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM
         An effective predictive maintenance program must include both condition-driven and
         time-driven tasks. These tasks are determined by the specific equipment and systems
         that constitute the plant. At a minimum, each plant should evalute:

               • Failure data
               • Improving equipment reliability
               • Improvement process
   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64