Page 228 - Introduction to Colloid and Surface Chemistry
P. 228

Colloid stability  217

        between  the  particles,  the  result  of which is a weakening of V A. In
        most  practical  situations  relating  to  colloid  stability this  retardation
        effect  is not  likely  to  be  important.
          The  major  problem  in calculating the  van  der  Waals interaction
        between  colloidal  particles  is  that  of  evaluating  the  Hamaker
        constant, A.  Two methods are available.
          The  first  of  these  methods  is  the  London-Hamaker  microscopic
        approach,  which  has  already  been  mentioned.  In  it  Hamaker
        constants  are  evaluated  from  the  individual atomic  polarisabilities
        and  the  atomic  densities  of  the  materials  involved.  The  total
        interaction  is assumed  to  be  the  sum of the  interactions  between  all
        interparticle  atom  pairs  and  is  assumed  to  centre  around  a  single
        oscillation  frequency.  These  assumptions  are  essentially  incorrect.
        The  influence  of  neighbouring atoms  on  the  interaction of  a given
        pair  of  atoms  is  ignored,  van  der  Waals  interaction  energies
        calculated in accord  with the microscopic approach  are  likely to be in
        error  but the error  involved is not likely to be so great as to prejudice
        general conclusions concerning colloid stability.
                                                               95 102
          The  other  method  is the  macroscopic  approach  of  Lifshiftz ' -
        103,198,199  j n  Wj 1j cj 1  th e  interacting  particles  and  the  intervening
        medium  are  treated  as  continuous  phases.  The  calculations  are
        complex,  and  require  the  availability  of  bulk  optical/dielectric
        properties  of  the  interacting  materials  over  a  sufficiently  wide
        frequency  range.
          The  values of  A  calculated  by  microscopic  and  by  macroscopic
        methods  tend  to  be  similar  in  the  non-retarded  range.  The
        macroscopic  approach  predicts  a  smaller  retardation  effect  (i.e.
        better applicability of equations 8.8-8.10 for relatively large values of
        H)  than the  microscopic  approach 104 .
          Hamaker constants for single materials usually vary between about
        10-20  j  an(j j0-i9 j  s ome examples are given in Table  8.3.  Where a
        range  of  values is quoted  for  a  given  material, this reflects  different
        methods  of  calculation within  the  basic microscopic  or  macroscopic
        method.
          The presence  of a liquid dispersion  medium, rather  than a vacuum
        (or  air),  between  the  particles  (as considered  so far) notably  lowers
        the  van der  Waals interaction  energy.  The  constant  A  in  equations
        (8.8)-~(8.10)  must  be  replaced  by  an  effective  Hamaker  constant.
        Consider  the  interaction  between  two  particles,  1  and  2,  in  a
        dispersion medium, 3. When the particles are far apart (Figure 8. la),
   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233