Page 251 - Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics
P. 251

P1: IBE
                                                                                   May 25, 2005
                                        0 521 85326 5
                                                                                                11:14
            0521853265c07
                           CB908/Date
                     230
                                                                                     PHASE CHANGE
                                > 1: Although this is a single-phase region, to account for property variation,
                            we set

                                                                         C ps
                                                 θ pc, j = θ m − (  − 1) 1 −   .               (7.51)
                                                                          C pl
                            Thus, θ pc is specified for the entire  > 0 range rather than being restricted to the
                            0 < < 1 range. Following Voller and Swaminathan [85], computations are car-
                                                                                                 2
                            ried out using  x = 0.01 m (or N = 52) and  t = 5 so that  τ = α s  t/ x =
                            3.96825. Equation 7.48 is solved using TDMA at each time step. It is found that
                            a maximum of two iterations are required to reduce the residual in the equation to
                                       −5
                            less than 10 . Figure 7.9(a) shows the time variation of the interface. In this case,
                            the interface location is identified with   = 0 [see definition (7.34)]. The computed
                            results are compared with the solution obtained by Voller [84] using the heat bal-
                            ance integral method (HBIM) since exact solution is not available for this highly
                            nonlinear case. The present computations show some waviness that is also observed
                            in [85] where computations are carried out using the h = f (T ) relationship rather
                            than the T = f (h) relationship used here. Figure 7.9(b) shows the temperature
                            histories at a few values of x. The solutions demonstrate jaggedness (typical of a
                            highly nonlinear θ–  relation) that is also observed by Chiu and Caldwell [6], who
                            used what is called Broyden’s method.
                               Finally, we note that the method presented in this section can also be ex-
                            tended to the case when phase change takes place at a unique temperature, that
                            is, θ s = θ l = θ m = 0. Because then, f ( ) = 0 (see Equation 7.41) and one can
                            readily adopt Equation 7.31 to evaluate θ pc . Similarly, the present method can also
                            be extended to multidimensional phase-change problems. The only care required is
                            in the evaluation of θ pc because several nodes can undergo phase change simulta-
                            neously. In Date [12, 13], the necessary considerations and the associated algebra
                            are explained.



                            EXERCISES

                             1. Write a general computer program for solving transcendental equation (7.8)
                                [63]. Hence, determine the value of C for the two materials and conditions
                                given in Table 7.2.

                             2. Modify Equation 7.22 for node j = 2, when the heat transfer coefficient h is
                                specified at boundary x = 0.
                             3. Show the validity of Equation 7.23 in a solidification problem.

                             4. With respect to Figure 7.4, demonstrate the correctness of Equation 7.30 and
                                hence of Equation 7.31.

                             5. Show the correctness of Equation 7.51 for  > 1.
   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256