Page 32 - Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics
P. 32

P2: IWV
            P1: JYD/GKJ
                                        0 521 85326 5
                           CB908/Date
            0521853265c01
                        1.5 A NOTE ON NAVIER–STOKES EQUATIONS
                                                            TRUE VARIATION         May 20, 2005  12:20  11
                               Y
                                                             OF PRESSURE
                                                 p
                                                 P
                                     X
                                                                     p
                                                                      E
                                p
                                 W
                                                  p
                                                   P
                        Figure 1.3. One-dimensional variation of pressure and stokes’s requirement.
                           where λ 1 is an arbitrary constant. In most textbooks, where a continuum is
                           assumed, λ 1 is trivially set to zero.
                        3. Case 3 (µ  = 0 and  · V  = 0): This case represents either compressible flow
                           where density is a function of both temperature and pressure or incompressible
                           flow with temperature-dependent density. Thus,
                                                            2

                                               p = p − q +    µ  · V .
                                                            3                              (1.14)
                           In this case, Stokes’s requirement will be satisfied if we set

                                               q = λ 1 (p − p) + λ  · V,                   (1.15)

                           where λ is the well-known second viscosity coefficient whose value is set
                           to − (2/3)µ even in a continuum.
                           It is instructive to note the reason for setting λ =−(2/3)µ. For, if this were not
                        done, it would amount to

                                                                    2           2
                                       (1 − λ 1 )(p − p)  · V = λ +  µ ( · V ) .           (1.16)
                                                                    3
                           Clearly, therefore, the system will experience dissipation (or reversible work
                        done at finite rate since  · V is associated with the rate of volume change) even
                        in an isothermal flow [65, 86]. This is, of course, highly improbable. 2
                           Thus, the Stokes’s relations require modifications in a continuum when com-
                        pressible flow is considered, and a physical explanation for this modification can
                        be found from thermodynamics. Now, the same interpretation can be afforded to
                        the λ 1 (p − p) part of q in Equation 1.13 or 1.15. This term represents a necessary
                        modification in a discretised space. This is an important departure from the forms
                        of normal stress expressions given in standard textbooks on fluid mechanics. It will
                        be shown in Chapter 5 that recognition of the need to include this term is central to
                        prediction of smooth pressure distributions via CFD in discrete space [17].


                        2  Schlichting [65] shows this improbability by considering the case of an isolated sphere of a com-
                          pressible isothermal gas subjected to uniform normal stress. Now if λ is not set to − (2/3) µ, the
                          gas will undergo oscillations.
   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37