Page 170 - Introduction to Mineral Exploration
P. 170

7: GEOPHYSICAL METHODS  153


                   Survey parameters such as line separation  to have anything approaching the knowledge of
                 and line orientation, and all specifications re-  a specific area and its geological problems that
                 lating to final reports and data displays, should  is possessed by the members of an exploration
                 be decided between the project geologists    team. Moreover, mining companies are often
                 and their geophysical adviser. More technical  reluctant to provide contractors, who may next
                 questions, such as tolerances (navigational  week be working for a competitor, with re-
                 and instrumental), instrument settings, flying  cently acquired data. Since such information
                 heights in airborne surveys, and data control  can be vital for good interpretation, contrac-
                 and reduction procedures, should be left to the  tors’ reports are often, through no fault of their
                 geophysicist. Geologists who set specifications  own, bland and superficial. They may only be
                 without this sort of help, perhaps relying on the  worth having if the method being used is so
                 contractor’s advice and goodwill, are taking  new or arcane that only the operating geophysi-
                 grave risks. Goodwill is usually abundant dur-  cists actually understand it.
                 ing initial negotiations, and contractors will,
                 after all, only stay in business if they keep their
                 clients reasonably happy, but as deadlines draw  7.19  FURTHER READING
                 closer, and profit margins come to look tighter,
                 it becomes more and more tempting to rely on  A number of textbooks cover the geophysical
                 the letter of the contract.                  techniques used in mineral exploration in some
                   Once a contract has been signed, the work  detail. Of these, the most comprehensive is
                 has to be done. The day-to-day supervision can  Applied Geophysics (Telford et al. 1990). A
                 usually be left to the geologists on the spot,  briefer but still excellent coverage is provided
                 who will find a comprehensive and tightly     by  An Introduction to Geophysical  Explora-
                 written contract invaluable. The greater the  tion (Kearey et al. 2002), while  Principles of
                 detail in which procedures are specified, the  Applied Geophysics (Parasnis 1996)  has a
                 easier it is to see if they are being followed  strong mineral exploration bias, derived from
                 and to monitor actual progress. Safety and the  the author’s own background in Scandinavia.
                 environment are becoming more important      Interpretation Theory in Applied Geophysics
                 every year, and although the contract may    (Grant & West 1965) is now hard to find but
                 (and should) specify that care for these are the  also hard to beat as a summary of the theoret-
                 responsibility of the contractor, the company  ical backgrounds to most geophysical methods.
                 commissioning the work will shoulder much    Practical Geophysics II (van Blaricom 1993)
                 of the blame if things go wrong. Random and  and  Geophysics and Geochemistry at the
                 unannounced visits to a field crew, especially  Millenium (Gubins 1997) provide a wealth
                 early in the morning (are they getting up at  of largely North American case histories and
                 a reasonable hour, without hangovers, and do  practical discussions but both tend to dis-
                 they have precise and sensible plans for the  integrate if taken into the field. A third edition
                 day’s work?) or at the end of the day (have they  of Practical Geophysics was produced in 1998,
                 worked a full day and are their field notes for  on CD-ROM only. Practical aspects of small
                 that day clear and intelligible?), are likely to  scale ground-based geophysical surveys and
                 be more useful than any number of formal     some elementary interpretational rules are
                 meetings with the party chief. Evening visits  discussed in Field Geophysics (Milsom 2002).
                 are particularly useful, revealing whether data  Valuable case histories are to be found in
                 reductions and paperwork are keeping pace    many journals, but especially in  Geophysics
                 with the field operations and whether the     and  Exploration Geophysics, published by
                 evenings are being passed in an alcoholic haze.  the Society of Exploration Geophysicists and
                   A geophysical contractor can reasonably be  the Australian Society of Exploration Geo-
                 expected to acquire data competently, with due  physicists respectively. The same two organ-
                 regard to safety and environmental protection,  izations publish newsletter journals (The
                 reduce it correctly, and present results clearly.  Leading Edge and Preview) that provide up-to-
                 Many also offer interpretations, but these may  the-minute reviews and case histories. Three
                 be of limited value. Few contractors are likely  Australian compilations, on orebodies at Elura
   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175