Page 302 - Introduction to Mineral Exploration
P. 302

12: CLIFFE HILL QUARRY AGGREGATE RESERVES  285


                 10 and 50 m of overburden. Although the flight  Between September 1981 and August 1982
                 augers could probably cope with this depth,  the drilling was concentrated on two areas of
                 removing the clay from the auger and clearing  the site:
                 the hole proved slow and difficult. The clay  1 Investigation of the proposed plant site.
                 was also expansive and, when wetted by the   Some 10 boreholes were drilled where access
                 water flush from a diamond bit, the hole tended  permitted.
                 to close and trap the core barrel. These related  2 Drilling of a newly acquired area to the
                 problems were ultimately solved by using a   northeast of Stud Farm.
                 drag bit and water flush. A drag bit is a bladed  The results confirmed the already familiar
                 bit which is used when the sticky material   picture of highly variable overburden thick-
                 such as clay and marl would clog up air flush  nesses, with the bedrock often “dipping away”
                 bits. The drag bit drilling technique produced  beneath rapidly thickening Triassic Mercia
                 an open hole to bedrock almost as fast as the  Mudstone overburden.
                 augers could when cleaning time was taken      Between April 1983 and March 1985 drilling
                 into account. In addition, the clay had to some  was carried out on a 50 m grid across the area of
                 extent expanded due to the water flush. By    the proposed quarry (Fig. 12.2) with the aim of:
                 drilling with sufficient annulus size (the gap  1 confirming the geophysical interpretation;
                 between the drill rods and the sidewall up   2 identifying the volume of weathered
                 which the drilling medium (air, water, or foam)  material;
                 carries the drill cuttings to the surface) and cas-  3 building up detailed knowledge of the faults,
                 ing placement to bedrock, a good core recovery  rock quality, etc., to enable detailed quarry
                 was usually possible (Bell & Hopkins 1988).  plans to be drawn up.
                   During the early drilling program the driller  The drilling results were used to produce the
                 remarked on the apparent low penetration rate  overburden isopach map (depth to bedrock)
                 of the core barrel. At the time this had been  (Fig. 12.4). This map was initially drawn inde-
                 assumed to be the result of operating in an  pendently of the geophysical data and clearly
                 uncased hole. Once the main program began it  shows the success of the previous electromag-
                 became apparent that, although the high rota-  netic and resistivity surveys in revealing the
                 tion speed improved penetration, the produc-  distribution of the overburden (Figs 12.5 &
                 tivity was lower than expected. A series of  12.6). Although some inaccuracy is evident in
                 checks and experiments narrowed the problem  the deeper areas, with the resistivity method
                 down to polishing of the impregnated core bits.  underestimating thickness of overburden, the
                 After a series of trials, conducted in conjunc-  two shallow ridges and steep sides were accur-
                 tion with one of the leading British bit manu-  ately delineated. Drilling indicated that these
                 facturers, a bit matrix which gave the optimum  features can be attributed to faulted blocks of
                 balance between bit wear and penetration was  markfieldite alternating with late Proterozoic
                 developed. Once this problem had been solved  metasediments, as seen in Cliffe Hill Quarry.
                 the drilling proceeded at a rapid rate (Bell &
                 Hopkins 1988). During the summer of 1981
                 a series of boreholes was drilled along a line  12.4.2 Geophysics
                 joining Stud Farm with Cliffe Hill Quarry    As indicated previously, the planning applica-
                 (Fig. 12.2). The aim was to investigate the route  tion was being prepared in parallel with the
                 of a proposed tunnel to link the two quarries.  exploration work and the work was coordin-
                 The purpose of the boreholes was twofold: (i) to  ated by a team of geologists, engineers, estates
                 delineate the bedrock–overburden interface,  surveyors, and landscape architects. The con-
                 in order to ensure that the tunnel which was  tinual acquisition of additional borehole data
                 planned to link Cliffe Hill Quarry to Stud Farm  during the planning of the project meant that
                 (section 12.4.5) remained in solid rock through-  occasionally parts of the scheme had to be
                 out its length, and (ii) to identify the engineer-  redesigned. However, the boreholes revealed
                 ing properties of the bedrock with particular  that the areal extent of the markfieldite
                 reference to jointing and faulting. Some heavy  was somewhat larger than originally anticip-
                 faulting was identified in two boreholes.     ated. It became apparent that a geophysical
   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307