Page 306 - Introduction to Mineral Exploration
P. 306

12: CLIFFE HILL QUARRY AGGREGATE RESERVES  289


                 Aggregate Abrasion Value (AAV) and Polished  E–W sections. In all cases the volumes were
                 Stone Value (PSV).                           converted to tonnages by multiplying the vol-
                   The Leicestershire quarries have historically  ume by the average relative density of the rock
                 supplied stone to the profitable British Rail  in a saturated, surface dried condition. In this
                 High Speed Track ballast market. In order to  case the value 2.7 was used for the fresh rock.
                 qualify for this market the stone must achieve  The final calculations were considered more
                 a very low and consistent value in a non-British  precise and were accorded a confidence limit
                 Standard wet attrition test. A larger size mater-  of ±10%.
                 ial is required for this test and consequently
                 only the 60-mm cores could be used. As testing
                 progressed, it proved possible to establish a us-  12.4.5 Quarry planning
                 able correlation between the water absorption  As the drilling and sample testing continued
                 values determined on all samples and the wet  with a progressive clarification of the com-
                 attrition values.                            bined overburden and weathered rock thick-
                   Over 120 samples of core were tested for   nesses, and of the overall structure, shape, and
                 some, or all, of the properties mentioned above.  quality of the deposit, three possible operating
                 The results provided the data necessary to de-  schemes were devised for developing the new
                 termine which markets could be penetrated    quarry in conjunction with recovering the size-
                 and what type of basic plant would be required  able resources which would become available
                 to produce the materials to satisfy those outlets  following the dismantling of the plant at the
                 in terms of both anticipated quantity and prod-  old quarry.
                 uct specification.                              Bell and Hopkins (1988) described these
                                                              three options as follows. A straightforward op-
                                                              tion to work out Cliffe Hill Quarry completely,
                 12.4.4 Reserve estimation
                                                              while towards the end of its life, develop-
                 The confidence in the resources grew as the   ing Stud Farm as its natural successor. This
                 amount of data increased and several refine-  scheme had several drawbacks. The dimen-
                 ments of the estimation method evolved as    sions of both quarries would impose a ceiling
                 follows:                                     on potential output. The extension of Cliffe
                 1 After the initial phase of flight auger drilling  Hill would require a road diversion and reloca-
                 an inferred resource estimate (USGS 1976) of  tion of the existing plant and unfortunately the
                 some 20 Mt ± 100% was quoted.                only feasible site for the latter would position
                 2 By the time the first planning application  it closer to an adjacent village. This potential
                 was submitted, a generalized bedrock and de-  plant site was also the only area suitable for
                 posit shape had been defined by widely spaced  overburden disposal. Even if these problems
                 boreholes and some typical cross-sections had  could be resolved for Cliffe Hill it would be
                 been drawn. A resource estimate based on the  necessary to install a second new plant when
                 area of the cross-section, extended to the mid  Stud Farm opened. This scheme was costed
                 point between sections likely to be recovered  out on the basis of capital investment and the
                 using an average quarry configuration, gave   return it would yield. The main stumbling
                 an enhanced figure with a confidence limit of  block proved to be the cost of establishing
                 ±20%.                                        two plants, each with a relatively short life.
                 3 By 1989 with much of the relevant drilling  These would have been economically viable
                 completed, two sets of cross-sections (N–S and  above certain quarry outputs but neither
                 E–W) at 50-m intervals were drawn. With a    quarry could supply the required outputs on a
                 provisional quarry development scheme super-  long-term basis.
                 imposed, a more precise reserve estimate was   The second option was the creation of a
                 produced. The extractable area on each cross-  quarry at Stud Farm at an early date with a new
                 section was multiplied by the distance to the  processing plant and quarry. Once this was
                 midpoint between the adjacent sections on    commissioned the existing Cliffe Hill plant
                 each side. The N–S sections were considered  would be demolished but crushing and screen-
                 best but the figures were also verified using the  ing would continue using a mobile plant. An
   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311