Page 31 - Introduction to Mineral Exploration
P. 31

14   C.J. MOON & A.M. EVANS



                    These new requirements have now led to a  on political risk in mining is the Fraser Insti-
                  time gap, often of several years in developed  tute in Vancouver (Fraser Institute 2003). It
                  countries, between the moment when a newly  publishes an annual review of the investment
                  found deposit is proved to be economically  attractiveness of many countries and regions
                  viable, and the time when the complex regulat-  based on a poll of mining company executives.
                  ory environment has been dealt with and gov-  The attractiveness is a combination of mineral
                  ernmental approval for development obtained.  potential and policy potential. Some countries,
                  During this time gap, and until production  for example Chile, rank at the top of both
                  occurs, no return is being made on the sub-  indices, whereas others, such as Russia, have a
                  stantial capital invested during the exploration  very high mineral potential index but a very
                  phase (see section 11.2).                   low policy potential index.

                  1.5.3 Taxation
                                                              1.6  RATIONALE OF MINERAL EXPLORATION
                  Overzealous governments may demand so
                  much tax that mining companies cannot make
                  a reasonable profit. On the other hand, some  1.6.1 Introduction
                  governments have encouraged mineral devel-  Most people in the West are environmental-
                  opment with taxation incentives such as a   ists at heart whether engaged in the mineral
                  waiver on tax during the early years of a mining  extraction industry or some other employ-
                  operation. This proved to be a great attraction  ment. Unfortunately many are of the “nimby”
                  to mining companies in the Irish Republic in  (not in my backyard) variety. These and many
                  the 1960s and brought considerable economic  other people fail to realize, or will not face up
                  gains to that country.                      to the fact, that it is Society that creates
                    Once an orebody is being exploited it has  the demand for minerals. The mining and
                  become a wasting asset and one day there will  quarrying companies are simply responding to
                  be no ore, no mine, and no further cash flow.  Society’s desire and demand for houses, wash-
                  The mine, as a company, will be wound up and  ing machines, cars with roads on which to
                  its shares will have no value. In other words, all  drive them, and so on.
                  mines have a limited life and for this reason  Two stark facts that the majority of ordinary
                  should not be taxed in the same manner as   people and too few politicians understand are
                  other commercial undertakings. When this is  first that orebodies are wasting assets (section
                  taken into account in the taxation structure of  1.5.3) and second that they are not evenly dis-
                  a country, it can be seen to be an important  tributed throughout the Earth’s crust. It is the
                  incentive to investment in mineral exploration  depleting nature of their orebodies that plays
                  and mining in that country.                 a large part in leading mining companies into
                                                              the field of exploration, although it must be
                                                              pointed out that exploration per se is not the
                  1.5.4 Political factors
                                                              only way to extend the life of a mining com-
                  Political risk is a major consideration in the  pany. New orebodies, or a share in them, can
                  selection of a country in which to explore. In  be acquired by financial arrangements with
                  the 1970s and 1980s the major fear was nation-  those who own them, or by making successful
                  alization with perhaps inadequate or even no  takeover bids. Many junior exploration com-
                  compensation. Possible political turmoil, civil  panies are set up with the idea of allowing
                  strife, and currency controls may all combine  others to buy into their finds (farming out is the
                  to increase greatly the financial risks of invest-  commercial term). The major mining com-
                  ing in certain countries. In the 1990s and 2000s  panies also sell orebodies that they consider too
                  perhaps more significant risks were long delays  small for them to operate.
                  or lack of environmental permits to operate,  The chances of success in exploration are
                  corruption, and arbitrary changes in taxation.  tiny. Only generalizations can be made but the
                  One of the most useful sources of information  available statistics suggest that a success rating
   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36