Page 142 - Introduction to Petroleum Engineering
P. 142

SEISMIC DATA ACQUISITION, PROCESSING, AND INTERPRETATION        129
            horizon. The resolution associated with reservoir geophysics is more quantitative
            than the resolution associated with exploration geophysics.
              Wittick (2000) and Pennington (2001) observed that the difference in resolution
            between  exploration  and  reservoir  geophysics  is  due  to  the  role  of  calibration.
            Ordinarily, no wells are available during the exploration process, so it is not possible
            to calibrate seismic data measurements with well log measurements. By contrast,
            well log data can be acquired during the development process to provide measure-
            ments in the wellbore that can be used to calibrate seismic surveys conducted at the
            surface. Consequently, reservoir geophysics can have more information available to
            improve quantitative estimates of reservoir properties if appropriate well log data is
            used to calibrate seismic data.
              The process of using calibrated seismic information to predict reservoir prop-
            erties is called seismic inversion. Seismic inversion is an attempt to correlate
            seismic attributes like acoustic impedance to rock properties. Seismic attributes
            are  cross‐plotted against groupings of rock properties. Examples of cross‐plots
            for  a formation with permeability  K, oil saturation  S , and net thickness  h
                                                                              net
                                                          o
            include  acoustic impedance versus porosity  ϕ, seismic amplitude versus flow
            capacity (Kh ) or rock quality (ϕKh ), and seismic amplitude versus oil produc-
                                          net
                      net
            tive capacity (S ϕKh ).
                        o
                             net
              One of the first examples of seismic inversion that included a field test was provided
            by De Buyl et  al. (1988).  They predicted reservoir properties at two wells using
            seismic inversion and then compared actual results to predicted results. A similar
            comparison was made between measurements at wells and predictions  prepared using
            only well logs. Predictions made with seismic inversion were at least as accurate as
            predictions made with well log data only and were more accurate in some cases.


            7.4  SEISMIC DATA ACQuISITION, PROCESSING,
            AND INTERPRETATION

            Subsurface geologic features are mapped in reflection seismology by measuring the
            time it takes an acoustic signal to travel from the source to a seismic reflector and
            then to a receiver. Three steps are required to analyze seismic measurements: data
            acquisition, data processing, and interpretation.


            7.4.1  Data Acquisition
            Seismic surveys are conducted to acquire seismic data. A 2‐D seismic survey uses a
            vibrational source and a single line of receivers to prepare a cross‐sectional image
            of the subsurface. A 3‐D seismic survey uses a line of sources with a 2‐D array of
            receivers to prepare a 3‐D image of the subsurface.
              The recorded seismic trace is a function of travel time and combines source signal
            with the sequence of seismic reflectors known as reflectivity sequence. Reflectors
            are determined by changes in acoustic impedance and the corresponding reflection
   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147