Page 210 - Introduction to Petroleum Engineering
P. 210

HYDRAULIC FRACTURING                                            197


                                                (
                          σ   =σ  =1908  psi + 095 4500  psi) = 6183  psi
                                             .
                           hmin  h
                              σ hmax  = 6183  psi + 2000  psi = 8183  psi

              During the fracking process, pressure measurements at the wellhead can provide
            feedback on the above estimates of stress. One pressure value that may be observed
            during preliminary stages of fracking is the frack closure pressure. It appears on the
            pressure–time plot as a quick change of slope. The frack closure pressure is key to
            selecting the type of proppant for a fracture. If the closure pressure exceeds the
            strength of the proppant, the proppant will be crushed, and the benefit of the fracture
            can be entirely lost. And if the proppant is sufficiently strong to prevent crushing,
            embedment of proppant particles in the walls of the formation will reduce the  fracture
            benefit. Table  10.3 lists proppant categories and their approximate closure stress
            limits. As there are many types of sand and ceramic proppants, the specific limita-
            tions of a proppant should be known before using it in a frack.
              Next, we consider fracture performance, its relation to conductivity of the fracture
            and the formation to be fracked, and the length of the fracture. In 1960, McGuire and
            Sikora published a short paper on this topic. They used an “electric analyzer” in their
            predigital‐computer‐age effort to study productivity for a quadrant of a 40‐acre (1320 ft
            on a side) drainage area with a fracture on one side. The length of a side of the 40‐acre
            quadrant is 1320 ft/ =  660 ft. Their Figure 2, which is reproduced in Figure 10.4,
                            2
            shows the productivity benefits of fracturing on the vertical axis as a function of relative
            conductivity of the fracture on the horizontal axis and the ratio R that equals fracture
            length L  divided by quadrant side length L , which is 660 ft for a 40‐acre drainage area.
                                             q
                  f
            The axes and the parameter R in Figure 10.4 are defined by the following equations:
            Vertical axis (left hand side):
                                                                     
                                                            .
                                                   J       713
                     Modified productivity indexratio =                (10.17)
                                                     
                                                   J o ln       / )) 
                                                       ( 0 472.  q ( Lr w  
            Horizontal axis:
                                                    wk  40
                                Relativeconductivity =  f                (10.18)
                                                     k   A

            TAbLE 10.3  Approximate Closure Pressure Limits for Proppant Categories

            Proppant                  Closure Pressure Limit (psi)  Temperature Limit (°F)
            Sand                              4000                   NA
            Resin‐coated sand                 8000                   250
            Intermediate‐strength ceramic    10000                   NA
            High‐strength ceramic           >12000                   NA
   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215