Page 267 - Introduction to Petroleum Engineering
P. 267

254                                          PRODUCTION PERFORMANCE


              Example 13.3  SEDM Model of Shale Gas Decline
              The SEDM model was used to model gas production rate for a shale gas well. The
              SEDM parameters for decline in shale gas rate for this well are
                                                     .
              q i  810 4  MSCF/month,   03.month, and n  02. Estimate the gas rate after
              3 years of production. Express time in months since the SEDM model parame-
              ters were calculated using monthly gas production.

              Answer
              The gas rate at t = 3 years = 36 months is

                               t  n              36  . 02
                   q   q exp         810 4  exp          5 5911 MSCF/mo
                        i
                                                  . 03



           13.3  PROBABILISTIC DCA

           The probabilistic estimate of reserves is a Monte Carlo procedure that uses the work-
           flow outlined in Figure 13.2 (Fanchi et al., 2013). Each step of the probabilistic DCA
           method in Figure 13.2 is briefly described in the following text.

              Step 1: gather rate‐time data
              Acquire production rate as a function of time. Remove significant shut‐in periods
              so rate‐time data represents continuous production.

              Step 2: Select a DCA model and specify input parameter distributions
              The number of input parameters depends on the DCA model chosen. The
              SEDM model requires three parameters, and the LNDM model requires two
              parameters. Parameter distributions may be either uniform or triangle
              distributions.

              Step 3: Specify constraints
              Available rate‐time production history is used to decide which DCA trials are
              acceptable. Every DCA model run that uses a complete set of model input param-
              eters constitutes a trial. The results of each trial are then compared to user‐speci-
              fied criteria. Criteria options include an objective function, rate at the end of
              history, and cumulative production at the end of history. The objective function
              quantifies the quality of the match by comparing the difference between model
              rates and observed rates. Objective functions with smaller values are considered
              better matches than objective functions with larger values because uncertainty
              has been reduced and  forecasts are more closely grouped together.
   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272