Page 141 - Introduction to chemical reaction engineering and kinetics
P. 141

6.3 Energy in Molecules 123
                           activation energy, EA,  of the reaction. Figure 6.3(d)  indicates atomic configurations
                           along the reaction coordinate.
                             In the elementary reaction
                                                     0’  + H,  4 OH’  + H’                   (6.3-la)


                           which is part of the reaction mechanism in hydrogen flames and the space shuttle main
                           rocket engine, the transition state would resemble:













                           The energy barrier for this reaction is quite low, 37  kJ  mol-I.  There are many schemes
                           for the estimation of the barrier height,  Et.  The simplest of these are based on empirical
                           correlations. For details see Steinfeld et al., 1989, p. 231.
                             The reverse reaction (BC +  A -+  AB + C) follows the same reaction coordinate
                           in the opposite direction. The barrier for the reverse reaction occurs at the same place.
                           The barrier height in the reverse direction is related to the barrier height in the forward
                           direction by

                                             E$ (reverse) = ES (forward) - AE(forward)        (6.3-2)

                           where AE (forward) is the reaction energy change in the forward direction. For exam-
                           ple, reaction 6.3-la is endoergic by approximately 9  kJ  mol-l,  and so the energy barrier
                           for the reverse reaction is 37 - 9 = 28 kJ mol-l.


                           6.3.1.3 Relationship Between Barrier Height and Reaction Energy
                           In reaction 6.3-1, the A-B bond weakens as the B-C bond is formed. If there is a bar-
                           rier, these two effects do not cancel. However, if the B-C bond is much stronger than
                           the A-B bond (very exoergic reaction), even partial B-C bond formation compensates
                           for the weakening of the A-B bond. This explains the observation that for a series of
                           similar reactions, the energy barrier (activation energy) is lower for the more exoergic
                           reactions. A correlation expressing this has been given by Evans and Polanyi (1938):

                                                    Et  =  Ei  + qAE(reaction)                (6.3-3)

                           where  E$ is the barrier for an energetically neutral reaction (such as CH;  + CD,  4
                           CH,D  +  CDT).  The correlation predicts the barriers  (Es)  for similar exoergic/endoergic
                           reactions to be smaller/larger by a fraction, 4, of the reaction energy (AE (reaction)).
                           For one set of H transfer reactions, the best value of q is 0.4. This correlation holds
                           only until the barrier becomes zero, in the case of sufficiently exoergic reactions; or
                           until the barrier becomes equal to the endoergicity, in the case of sufficiently endoergic
                           reactions. Figure 6.4 shows reaction coordinate diagrams for a hypothetical series of
                           reactions, and the “data” for these reactions are indicated in Figure 6.4, along with the
                           Evans-Polanyi correlation (dashed line). This and other correlations allow unknown
                           rate constant parameters to be estimated from known values.
   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146