Page 115 - Key Words in Religion Media and Culture
P. 115

98  David Morgan

             control the beguiling appeal of the arts of representation, Socrates proposed
             the stringent regulation of musical and poetic enjoyment. The ideal was to
             match a noble soul to a beautiful body (Plato 1992: 79). Most music, poetry,
             and virtually all visual art, he regretted, failed to strike that all-important
             balance between psyche and soma, tipping the favor instead to the body’s
             unruly passions.
               The Socratic critique has enjoyed intermittent revival over two millennia
             and, as we shall see, informed several influential twentieth-century critics of
             mass culture. However, in recent years scholars and critics have recognized
             the  embodied  nature  of  seeing,  inquiring  into  the  body’s  role  in  making
             sense of film and other visual media (Sobchack 2004). W.J.T. Mitchell has
             even argued that the term visual media is deceptive because it occludes the
             important way in which film, painting, or television rely on the full range
             of sensoria (Mitchell 2005). Film maker David MacDougall has written that
             “we see with our bodies, and any image we make carries the imprint of our
             bodies” (MacDougall 2006: 3). A complementary way of thinking about this
             is that images see us, projecting themselves over the screens of our bodies,
             the fleshy, dense surfaces that actively respond when, to use Roland Barthes’
             provocative idea, an image punctures or pricks us with what he called its
             punctum  (Barthes  1981:  27).  Such  instructive  studies  suggest  that  what
             Socrates and many others may find dangerous about images is precisely the
             way they insinuate the body and its felt ways of knowing, its sensuous forms
             of cognition, into the linguistic and rational spaces of controlled discourse—
             theology,  catechism,  preaching,  evangelism,  teaching,  philosophizing,  and
             scholarship.
               Understanding the importance of images in modern media culture (and
             in any historical epoch) means examining the fear of images, the practices
             of their use, and notions of their power. Doing so will allow us to discern
             various ways in which images have been situated within accounts of human
             cognition as well as the construction of human values. The task is to recover
             the embodied nature of seeing in the history of thought and practice regarding
             mediation. In what follows, I attempt a sketch of the themes and something
             of the historiography that might belong to such a project.


             Moral policing and the power of images

             Western  philosophical  and  theological  reflection  on  images  has  been
             preoccupied with their truth and falsehood, which are expressed in Judaism,
             Christianity, and Islam in terms of the singularly negative category of the
             idol. In practice, it is very important to point out, each of these religions has
             often departed sharply from the rigid theological standards that many of its
             authorities and intellectuals have upheld as strictly representative of all “true”
   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120