Page 98 - Key Words in Religion Media and Culture
P. 98

Culture  81

               religion—tends to assume a reality of its own which renders problematic
               its very representability.
                                                                    (2003: 1) 12

               In her inaugural lecture at The Free University in 2006, Meyer pursued
             further the rich contradiction in cultural production that the mediation of
             religious life makes particularly apparent—that much of what is most human
             about being human (i.e., thinking and the imagination, the “social” itself as
             relations between people) must be concretized through material mediation:
             what I have called above “materializing process.” Indeed, Meyer calls it a
             “materiality that is not opposed to, but rather a condition for, spirituality”
             (2006a: 32). Possibly the study of the religion-media nexus can, in fact, offer
             something back to cultural theory itself, speaking to this central problematic
             of  its  processual  dynamics  that  involve  us  inevitably  in  mediation  of  all
             kinds.


             Notes

               1  Tomoko  Masuzawa,  in  yet  another  “Critical  Terms”  book,  notes  that  “the
                 categories  religion  and  culture…are  both  historically  specific,  fairly  recent
                 formations, and our daily employment of these terms…is in fact mobilizing and
                 energizing a powerful ideology of modernity…” (1998: 71).
               2  In texts such as Philosophy in a New Key: A Study in the Symbolism of Reason,
                 Rite, and Art, published in 1942 and Feeling and Form: A Theory of Art (1953),
                 Langer linked new work in symbolic logic based in mathematical and linguistic
                 forms to aesthetics and drama.
               3  E.B. Tylor in Primitive Cultures (1874: 1) is credited with that first definition:
                 “…that  complex  whole  which  includes  knowledge,  belief,  art,  morals,  law,
                 custom, and any other capabilities and habits acquired by man as a member of
                 society.” This anthropologically inclusive notion of culture emerged into wider
                 social circulation after World War II, with Ruth Benedict’s work (1934/1959;
                 Masuzawa 1998: 79). When I first came to graduate school in the mid-seventies,
                 I recall being given Geertz’s essays by a fellow student who was, of all things, a
                 geographer! This was part of my own motivation for pursuing an education in
                 anthropological theory.
               4  In England, the Birmingham School of cultural studies, in many respects, picked
                 up where Frankfort School critical theory left off (Agger 1992: 1–23) and was
                 deeply influenced by the writings of Raymond Williams (e.g., 1981) and Stuart
                 Hall (e.g., 1985).
               5  See Catherine Bell’s book, Ritual Theory, Ritual Practice, indebted to Bourdieu
                 and influential in religious studies (Bell 1992).
               6  These titles include Religions of India in Practice (1995), Buddhism in Practice
                 (1995),  Religions  of  China  in  Practice  (1996),  Religions  of  Tibet  in  Practice
   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103