Page 192 - Materials Chemistry, Second Edition

190 9. Life cycle decision support framework: Method and case study

ED (FI,H) (1.26, 1.68, 2.1) ED (EI,VH) 1) 1, (1,

1) 1, CO 2 CO 2
PO (EI,M) (1, PO (VI,M) (1.78, 2.13, 2.49) cost 0.84, cost 0.84,
Total without (WI, H) (0.56, 1.26) Total without (WI, H) (0.56, 1.26)
1)
(EI,M) 1, (VI,L) (1.37,
TE (1, TE 1.64, 1.92) 1) 1)
Total cost (EI,VH) 1, (1, Total cost (EI,VH) 1, (1,

MAE (EI,VH) 1) 1, (1, MAE (VI,VH) (2.38, 2.82, 3.33)
costs (VI,H) 2.52, costs (VI,H) 2.52,

1)
2.94) 2.94) WAE (EI,VH) 1, (1, WAE (WI,M) (0.47, 0.71, 0.82) CO 2 (2.1, 2.94) CO 2 (2.1, 2.94)

2.52, 2.52, 2.1) 2.1)
Social (VI,H) (2.1, Social (VI,H) (2.1, HT (FI,H) (1.26, 1.68, 2.1) HT (WI,H) (0.56, 0.84, 1.26) Storage container (FI,H) 1.68, (1.26, Storage container (FI,H) 1.68, (1.26,

3.2) ODP (EI,VH) 1) 1, (1, ODP (VI,M) (1.78, 2.13, 2.49)
comparison. Economic (AI,M) 2.84, (2.49, Economic (EI,VH) 1) 1, (1, GW (EI,VH) 1) 1, (1, GW (WI,H) (0.56, 0.84, 1.26) Collection container (FI,H) 2.1) 1.68, (1.26, Collection container (FI,H) 2.1) 1.68, (1.26,

alternative Environmental Environmental 3.2) 2.84, EU (EI,M) 1) 1, (1, EU (VI,M) (1.78, 2.13, 2.49) 1.68, 1.68,

best (EI,VH) 1) 1, (1, (AI,M) (2.49, 1) Transport (FI,H) (1.26, 2.1) Transport (FI,H) (1.26, 2.1)
for AC (EI,H) 1, (1, AC (VI,M) (1.78, 2.13, 2.49)
matrix criteria Environmental (WI,M) (0.56, 0.84, 1.26) (EI,M) 1) 1, Personnel (FI,H) 1.68, (1.26, 2.1) Personnel (FI,H) 1.68, (1.26, 2.1)

decision-making best The Economic AD GW AD EU (1, cost Total cost Total

The DM DM1 DM2 DM1 DM2 DM1 DM2

9.5
TABLE Range Perspectives Environmental Economic