Page 194 - Materials Chemistry, Second Edition

192 9. Life cycle decision support framework: Method and case study

TABLE 9.6 The decision-making matrix for worst alternative comparison.
DM1 Environmentalist DM2 Top manager
Perspective Economic Environmental
Environmental (AI,M) (2.49, Environmental (EI,VH) (1, 1, 1)
2.84, 3.2)
Economic (EI,VH) (1, 1, 1) Economic (AI,M) (2.49,
2.84, 3.2)
Social (WI,M) (0.47, Social (WI,M) (0.47,
0.71, 0.82) 0.71, 0.82)
EU MAE
Environmental AD (WI,L) (0.37, AD (VI,M) (1.78,
0.55, 0.82) 2.13, 2.49)
AC (FI,H) (1.26, AC (EI,M) (1, 1, 1)
1.68, 2.1)
EU (FI,M) (1.07, EU (EI,M) (1, 1, 1)
1.42, 1.78)
GW (FI,H) (1.26, GW (FI,H) (1.26,
1.68, 2.1) 1.68, 2.1)
ODP (FI,M) (1.07, ODP (EI,M) (1, 1, 1)
1.42, 1.78)
HT (EI,L) (1, 1, 1) HT (FI,VH) (1.43, 1.9,
2.38)
WAE (FI,H) (1.26, WAE (FI,M) (1.07,
1.68, 2.1) 1.42, 1.78)
MAE (FI,H) (1.26, MAE (EI,VH) (1, 1, 1)
1.68, 2.1)
TE (FI,M) (1.07, TE (EI,M) (1, 1, 1)
1.42, 1.78)
PO (FI,M) (1.07, PO (EI,M) (1, 1, 1)
1.42, 1.78)
ED (EI,VH) (1, 1, 1) ED (VI,H) (2.1, 2.52,
2.94)
CO 2 costs CO 2 costs
Economic Personnel (WI,L) (0.37, Personnel (WI,L) (0.37,
0.55, 0.82) 0.55, 0.82)
Transport (WI,H) (0.56, Transport (WI,H) (0.56,
0.84, 1.26) 0.84, 1.26)
Collection container (WI,H) (0.56, Collection container (WI,H) (0.56,
0.84, 1.26) 0.84, 1.26)