Page 206 - Materials Chemistry, Second Edition
P. 206

204                   9. Life cycle decision support framework: Method and case study

                 Tsai, W.H., Lin, S.J., Lee, Y.F., et al., 2013. Construction method selection for green building projects to improve en-
                   vironmental sustainability by using an MCDM approach. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 56, 1487–1510. https://doi.org/
                   10.1080/09640568.2012.731385.
                 Tsoutsos, T., Drandaki, M., Frantzeskaki, N., et al., 2009. Sustainable energy planning by using multi-criteria analysis
                   application in the island of Crete. Energy Policy. 37, 1587–1600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.011.
                 Turskis, Z., Zavadskas, E.K., 2011. A new fuzzy additive ratio assessment method (Aras-F). Case study: the analysis of
                   fuzzy multiple criteria in order to select the logistic centers location. Transport. 25, 423–432. https://doi.org/
                   10.3846/transport.2010.52.
                 Validi, S., Bhattacharya, A., Byrne, P.J., 2014. A case analysis of a sustainable food supply chain distribution system—a
                   multi-objective approach. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 152, 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.02.003.
                 van de Kaa, G., Kamp, L., Rezaei, J., 2017. Selection of biomass thermochemical conversion technology in the
                   Netherlands: a best worst method approach. J. Clean. Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.052.
                 Vinyes, E., Oliver-Sola `, J., Ugaya, C., et al., 2013. Application of LCSA to used cooking oil waste management. Int. J.
                   Life Cycle Assess. 18, 445–455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0482-z.

                                       ˇ
                 Vu  cijak, B., Kupusovi  c, T., MidZi  c-Kurtagi  c, S., Ceri  c, A., 2013. Applicability of multicriteria decision aid to sustain-
                   able hydropower. Appl. Energy. 101, 261–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.05.024.
                 Wang, H., Jiang, Z., Zhang, H., et al., 2019. An integrated MCDM approach considering demands-matching for re-
                   verse logistics. J. Clean. Prod. 208, 199–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.131.
                 Wulf, C., Werker, J., Zapp, P., et al., 2018. Sustainable development goals as a guideline for indicator selection in life
                   cycle sustainability assessment. Procedia CIRP, 59–65.
                 Xu, D., Lv, L., Ren, J., et al., 2017. Life cycle sustainability assessment of chemical processes: A vector-based three-
                   dimensional algorithm coupled with AHP. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.7b02041.
                 Yazdani, M., Chatterjee, P., Zavadskas, E.K., Streimikiene, D., 2018. A novel integrated decision-making approach for
                   the evaluation and selection of renewable energy technologies. Clean Techn. Environ. Policy. 20, 403–420. https://
                   doi.org/10.1007/s10098-018-1488-4.
                 Yoon, K.P., Hwang, C.-L., 1995. Multiple Attribute Decision Making: An Introduction. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
                 Yu, S.M., Wang, J., Qiang, W.J., Li, L., 2018. A multi-criteria decision-making model for hotel selection with linguistic
                   distribution assessments. Appl. Soft Comput. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2017.08.009.
                 Zadeh, L.A., 2011. A note on Z-numbers. Inf. Sci. 181, 2923–2932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2011.02.022.
                 Zavadskas, E.K., Baus ˇys, R., Lazauskas, M., 2015. Sustainable assessment of alternative sites for the construction of a
                   waste incineration plant by applying WASPAS method with single-valued neutrosophic set. Sustainability.
                   7, 15923–15936. https://doi.org/10.3390/su71215792.
                 Zavadskas, E.K., Vaini  unas, P., Turskis, Z., Tamos ˇaitien_ e, J., 2012. Multiple criteria decision support system for as-
                   sessment of projects managers in construction. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak. 11, 501–520. https://doi.org/
                   10.1142/s0219622012400135.
                 Ze  cevi  c, S., Tadi  c, S., Krsti  c, M., 2017. Intermodal transport terminal location selection using a novel hybrid MCDM
                   model. Int. J. Uncertainty Fuzziness Knowledge Based Syst. 25, 853–876. https://doi.org/10.1142/
                   s0218488517500362.
                 Zhang, L., Bai, W., Yu, J., et al., 2018. Critical mineral security in China: an evaluation based on hybrid MCDM
                   methods. Sustainability 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10114114.
                 Zhang, L., Zhou, P., Newton, S., et al., 2015. Evaluating clean energy alternatives for Jiangsu, China: an improved
                   multi-criteria decision making method. Energy. 90, 953–964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.07.124.
                 Zhao, H., Guo, S., 2014. Selecting green supplier of thermal power equipment by using a hybrid MCDM method for
                   sustainability. Sustainability. 6, 217–235. https://doi.org/10.3390/su6010217.
                 Zhao, H., Li, N., 2016. Optimal siting of charging stations for electric vehicles based on fuzzy Delphi and hybrid multi-
                   criteria decision making approaches from an extended sustainability perspective. Energies 9. https://doi.org/
                   10.3390/en9040270.
                 Zheng, X., Easa, S.M., Yang, Z., et al., 2019. Life-cycle sustainability assessment of pavement maintenance alternatives:
                   methodology and case study. J. Clean. Prod. 213, 659–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.227.
   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211