Page 202 - Materials Chemistry, Second Edition
P. 202

200                   9. Life cycle decision support framework: Method and case study

                 De Luca, A.I., Falcone, G., Stillitano, T., et al., 2018. Evaluation of sustainable innovations in olive growing systems:
                   A life cycle sustainability assessment case study in southern Italy. J. Clean. Prod. 171, 1187–1202. https://doi.org/
                   10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.119.
                 Debnath, A., Roy, J., Kar, S., et al., 2017. A hybrid MCDM approach for strategic project portfolio selection of agro
                   by-products. Sustainability 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9081302.
                 Del Can ˜oA,Go ´mez D, De La Cruz MP (2012) Uncertainty analysis in the sustainable design of concrete structures: a
                   probabilistic method. Construct. Build Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.04.020.
                 Diaz-Balteiro, L., Gonza ´lez-Pacho ´n, J., Romero, C., 2017. Measuring systems sustainability with multi-criteria
                   methods: a critical review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 258, 607–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.08.075.
                 Dı ´az-Cuevas, P., Camarillo-Naranjo, J.M., P  erez-Alca ´ntara, J.P., 2018. Relational spatial database and multi-criteria
                   decision methods for selecting optimum locations for photovoltaic power plants in the province of Seville
                   (southern Spain). Clean Techn. Environ. Policy. 20, 1889–1902. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-018-1587-2.
                 Dimi  c, S., Pamu  car, D., Ljubojevi  c, S., Dorovi  c, B., 2016. Strategic transport management models—the case study of an
                   oil industry. Sustainability 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8090954.
                 Ekener, E., Hansson, J., Larsson, A., Peck, P., 2018. Developing life cycle sustainability assessment methodology by
                   applying values-based sustainability weighting—tested on biomass based and fossil transportation fuels. J. Clean.
                   Prod. 181, 337–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.211.
                 Entezaminia, A., Heydari, M., Rahmani, D., 2016. A multi-objective model for multi-product multi-site aggregate pro-
                   duction planning in a green supply chain: considering collection and recycling centers. J. Manuf. Syst. 40, 63–75.
                   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2016.06.004.
                 Fallahpour, A., Udoncy Olugu, E., Nurmaya Musa, S., et al., 2017. A decision support model for sustainable supplier
                   selection in sustainable supply chain management. Comput. Ind. Eng. 105, 391–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
                   cie.2017.01.005.
                 Formisano, A., Mazzolani, F.M., 2015. On the selection by MCDM methods of the optimal system for seismic
                   retrofitting and vertical addition of existing buildings. Comput. Struct. 159, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
                   compstruc.2015.06.016.
                 Gao, R., Nam, H.O., Il, K.W., Jang, H., 2017. National options for a sustainable nuclear energy system: MCDM eval-
                   uation using an improved integrated weighting approach. Energies 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10122017.
                 Govindan, K., Khodaverdi, R., Jafarian, A., 2013. A fuzzy multi criteria approach for measuring sustainability per-
                   formance of a supplier based on triple bottom line approach. J. Clean. Prod. 47, 345–354. https://doi.org/
                   10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.04.014.
                 Govindan, K., Madan Shankar, K., Kannan, D., 2016. Sustainable material selection for construction industry—a hy-
                   brid multi criteria decision making approach. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 55, 1274–1288.
                 Guo, S., Zhao, H., 2015. Optimal site selection of electric vehicle charging station by using fuzzy TOPSIS based on
                   sustainability perspective. Appl. Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.08.082.
                 Halog, A., Manik, Y., 2011. Advancing integrated systems modelling framework for life cycle sustainability assess-
                   ment. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su3020469.
                 Hayashi, K., Hondo, H., Moriizumi, Y., 2016. Preference construction processes for renewable energies: assessing the
                   influence of sustainability information and decision support methods. Sustainability 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/
                   su8111114.
                 He, B., Luo, T., Huang, S., 2019. Product sustainability assessment for product life cycle. J. Clean. Prod. 206, 238–250.
                   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.097.
                 Ho, W., Xu, X., Dey, P.K., 2010. Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: a
                   literature review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.05.009.
                 Hsu, C.W., Kuo, T.C., Shyu, G.S., Chen, P.S., 2014. Low carbon supplier selection in the hotel industry. Sustainability.
                   6, 2658–2684. https://doi.org/10.3390/su6052658.
                 Huang, C.Y., Chung, P.H., Shyu, J.Z., et al., 2018. Evaluation and selection of materials for particulate matter MEMS
                   sensors by using hybrid MCDM methods. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103451.
                 Inti, S., Tandon, V., 2017. Application of fuzzy preference–analytic hierarchy process logic in evaluating sustainability
                   of transportation infrastructure requiring multicriteria decision making. J. Infrastruct. Syst. https://doi.org/
                   10.1061/(asce)is.1943-555x.0000373.
                 Ioppolo, G., Traverso, M., Finkbeiner, M., 2019. Preface—a new paradigm for life cycle thinking: Exploring sustain-
                   ability in urban development scenarios. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-019-01586-x.
   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207