Page 69 - Literacy in the New Media Age
P. 69

58 LITERACY IN THE NEW MEDIA AGE

            him  mastery  over  his  environment’  and  ‘In  your  first  circuits  you  used  torch
            bulbs joined with wires. Modern electrical equipment uses the same basic ideas.
            But if you look inside a computer there are not many wires or torch bulbs.’ Apart
            from the noticeable difference in gendered aspects of language, we can see that
            the first sentence is syntactically complex; it consists of five clauses: ‘man has
            been turning his wits’; ‘the problem is …’; ‘how to increase the small force’; ‘he
            can exert’; ‘give him mastery …’ This kind of syntax is entirely usual for written
            texts in that period, the 1950s. By contrast, the sentences from the later text, from
            1988, have one or two clauses, never more.
              The  definition  of  what  a  sentence  is  has  proved  notoriously  elusive;  my
            definition here is intended to serve my argument about gains and losses. If we
            take  a  clause  as  the  report  of  an  event  or  of  a  state  of  affairs  in  the  world,  a
            sentence  is  then  a  unit  in  which  one  or  more  such  reports  are  unified  into  one
            complex representational and communicational entity. Simple things are joined,
            in often complex ways, to become complex things. A sentence, by its structure,
            says ‘these things all belong closely together as one conceptual whole’. Seen in
            that  light,  the  move  from  complex  sentence-syntax  to  the  simpler  sentence-
            syntax  of  the  more  recent  example  gives  away  the  means  for  constructing
            conceptually complex things. It is at this point that I believe the argument starts:
            what  kind  of  use(fulness)  attaches  to  such  forms?  Can  we  imagine  a  cultural
            world in which we do not have the means of making such complexes? Of course
            we  can  imagine  humans  not  trained  in  the  conceptual  complexities  of  such
            forms,  and  not  able  to  produce  them  –  those  who  live  largely  in  the  world  of
            speech  do;  they  have  forms  which  have  constructed  different  means  of  being
            complex.  But  still,  this  is  a  resource  which  can  be  available  to  all.  What
            cognitive  and  cultural  consequences  follow  if  that  resource  is  no  longer
            available?
              At the same time, the page where the simple sentences quoted above occur is
            multimodally constructed (see Figure 9.7). A part of the task of reading that page
            is to make meaning from the two modes independently and in conjunction. This
            is a conceptually new task, and though we do not at the moment have the means
            for comparing the two kinds of task, we can tell they are different. In terms of
            ‘reading’, the one, with the complex syntax, asks that the readerfollow the pre-
            given complexitites of the syntactic reading path; the other asks that the reader
            establish  a  reading  path  on  the  basis  of  criteria  of  her  or  his  relevance.  At  the
            moment it is too difficult to know just what the conceptualcognitive gains and
            losses  are.  It  is,  however,  possible  to  say,  with  considerable  certainty,  that  the
            tasks of reading the multimodal texts are entirely in line with tasks in quite other
            domains, where what is at issue is also the establishing of ordering on the basis
            of  criteria  of  salience  or  relevance  brought  to  the  textby  the  reader,  planner,
            designer and so on. The economy at large seems to be organised in this manner,
            from the micro-levels to the largest levels of organisation.
   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74