Page 179 - Machine Learning for Subsurface Characterization
P. 179

Robust geomechanical characterization Chapter  5 153


































             FIG. 5.10 Two-dimensional projection of formation depths generated using the t-SNE
             dimensionality reduction algorithm based on the topological relationships among the easy-to-
             acquire logs at each depth, which are colored according to (A) relative error in log synthesis, (B)
             lithology, (C) K-means-derived cluster numbers, and (D) Gaussian mixture model-derived
             cluster numbers. Each point represents a specific formation depth, and neighboring points in the
             two-dimensional projection have greater similarity. Red circles denote formation depths that
             exhibit high relative error in log synthesis.


             based on the log responses will be projected as neighbors in the t-SNE manifold.
             t-SNE divides the formation depths into several blocks such that data points in
             one block are most similar. The shapes of blocks are random, and they change
             when the t-SNE algorithm is applied using different hyperparameters. In these
             sub plots, the value of the x-axis and y-axis does not have any physical meaning.
             Fig. 5.10A is colored with the relative error in ANN-based synthesis of DTS and
             DTC logs. In the figure, formations with higher relative errors are concentrated
             in the two blocks highlighted inside red circles. Fig. 5.10A indicates that only
             5% of the formation depths have relative error higher than 0.4. Comparing
             Fig. 5.10A and B, the data points with low prediction accuracy (in red
             circles) are mostly from formation lithology 5, 6, 7, and 8. For other
             lithology, the relative errors of log synthesis are mostly lower than 0.2. Most
             of the formations 1 and 2 have relative errors lower than 0.1 and belong to
             K-means cluster of 0. Comparing Fig. 5.10A and B, the prediction relative
             error has a similar pattern with the lithology. Fig. 5.10C and D is colored
             with the cluster numbers computed using K-means and Gaussian mixture
   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184