Page 105 - Macromolecular Crystallography
P. 105

94  MACROMOLECULAR CRYS TALLOGRAPHY

        a difference Fourier map. Again the success of this  References
        feed-back technique depends on the correctness of
                                                     Abdel-Meguid, S. S. (1996). Structure determination using
        the phasing model.
                                                      isomorphous replacement. Method Mol. Biol. 56, 153–171.
                                                     Abdel-Meguid, S. S., Grindley, N. D. F., Templeton, N. S.
                                                      and Steitz, T. A. (1984). Cleavage of the site-specific
        6.8 Refinement of heavy-atom positions         recombination protein γδ resolvase: the smaller of the
                                                      two fragments binds DNA specifically. Proc. Natl. Acad.
        Once the positions of the heavy atoms have been
                                                      Sci. USA 81, 2001–2005.
        determined, their accuracy can be significantly
                                                     Ban, N., Nissen, P., Hansen, J., Moore, P. B. and
        improved through least squares refinement. This
                                                      Steitz, T. A. (2000). The complete atomic structure of the
        is achieved by allowing the heavy-atom positions,  large ribosomal subunit at 2.4A resolution, Science 289,
        thermal parameters, and occupancy to vary, while  905–920.
        minimizing the difference between the structure  Blundell, T. L. and Johnson, L. N. (1976). Protein Crystallog-
        factor amplitudes calculated from the heavy-atom  raphy. Academic Press, London.
        model and experimentally measured amplitudes. It  Crick, F. H.C. and Magdoff, B. S. (1956). The theory of the
        is important to note that thermal parameters and  method of isomorphous replacement for protein crystals.
        occupancy are often correlated and should not be  Acta Crystallogr. 9, 901–908.
                                                     Drenth, J. (1999). Principles of Protein X-ray Crystallography,
        refined in the same cycle. A good strategy in heavy-
                                                      2nd edn. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
        atom refinement is to obtain the best possible heavy-
                                                     Drew, H., Takano, T., Takana, S., Itakura, K. and
        atom model for each derivative alone, and then add
                                                      Dickerson, R. E. (1980). High-salt d(CpGpCpG), a left-
        one derivative at a time while refining, to insure that
                                                      handed Z’ DNA double helix. Nature (London) 286,
        the best derivative does not dominate phasing to the  567–573.
        exclusion of others. Also, it is better to omit minor  Garman, E. and Murray, J. W. (2003). Heavy-atom deriva-
        sites from the initial refinement if there is doubt  tization. Acta Crystallogr. D 59, 1903–1913.
        about their existence. These sites can be included  Green, D. W., Ingram, V. M. and Perutz, M. F. (1954).
        in later steps of refinement when it becomes more  The structure determination of heamoglobin: IV. Sign
        certain that they are real.                   determination by the isomorphous replacement method.
                                                      Proc. R. Soc. London A225, 287–307.
                                                     Hatfull, G. F., Sanderson, M. R., Freemont, P. S., Raccuia,
        6.9 Conclusion                                P. R., Grindley, N. D. F. and Steitz, T. A. (1989). Prepa-
                                                      ration of heavy-atom derivatives using site-directed
        Although the technique of isomorphous replace-  mutagenesis: introduction of cysteine residues into γδ
        ment was the dominant crystallographic technique  resolvase. J. Mol. Biol. 208, 661–667.
        for determination of de novo protein structures since  Holbrook, S. R. and Kim, S.-H. (1985). Crystallization
        its development in the early 1950s to the early  and heavy-atom derivatives of polynucleotides. Method
                                                      Enzymol. 114, 167–176.
        1990s, today it is but one of several techniques
                                                     Kendrew, J. C., Bodo, G., Dintzis, H. M., Parrish, R. G.,
        used routinely by those interested in elucidating
                                                      Wyckoff, H. W. and Phillips, D. C. (1958). Nature
        thethree-dimensionalstructuresofmacromolecules.
                                                      181, 662.
        Now those interested in crystallographic structure
                                                     Kendrew, J. C., Dickerson, R. E., Strandberg, B. E.,
        determination can choose from a number of meth-  Hart, R. G., Davies, D. R., Phillips, D. C. and Shore, V.
        ods to solve the phase problem, including single  (1960). Nature 185, 422.
        and multiple isomorphous replacement each with  Kim, S.-H., Shin, W. C. and Warrant, R. W. (1985). Heavy
        or without anomalous scattering, single- and multi-  metal ion-nucleic acid interaction. Method Enzymol. 114,
        wavelengthanomalousdiffraction(SAD/MAD),and   156–167.
        molecular replacement. The choice of which method  Patterson, A. L. (1934). A Fourier series method for the
                                                      determination of the components of interatomic dis-
        to use can depend on a number of factors, such as the
                                                      tances in crystals. Phys. Rev. 46, 372–376.
        availability of synchrotron radiation, atomic coordi-
                                                     Petsko, G. A. (1985). Preparation of isomorphous heavy-
        nates of homologous protein, protein expressed in
                                                      atom derivatives. Method Enzymol. 114, 147–156.
        the presence of selenomethionine, etc.
   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110