Page 101 - Macromolecular Crystallography
P. 101

90  MACROMOLECULAR CRYS TALLOGRAPHY

        6.3 Selection of heavy-atom reagents         with proteins in a similar fashion, except for those
                                                     containing (Pt(CN) 2 ) 2−  which bind to positively
        Both the size and chemical composition of the
                                                     charged residues. Mercurial compounds are the sec-
        molecule under investigation are important criteria
                                                     ond most successful group of reagents in derivative
        to consider when selecting heavy-atom reagents for
                                                     preparation; most mercurials either bind to cysteine
        derivatization. Ones choice must insure that the
                                                     sulphurs or histidine nitrogens. In addition to plat-
        differences in diffraction amplitudes due to heavy-
                                                     inum and mercury, Fig. 6.1 show the many elements
        atom contributions are larger than the errors in
                                                     successfully used in isomorphous replacement
        data measurement. The size of the heavy atom
                                                     phasing.
        (atomic number) and the number of sites required
        for successful phasing are proportional to the size
        (molecular weight) of the macromolecule. Larger
        macromolecules may require not only atoms of high  6.4 Heavy atoms and their ligands
        atomic number, but also more than one heavy atom
                                                     The preparation of heavy-atom derivatives and
        per molecule. For example the structure determina-
                                                     selection of reagents have been extensively reviewed
        tion of the ribosome required heavy-atom clusters
                     +2                              (Abdel-Meguid, 1996; Blundell and Johnson, 1976;
        such as Ta 6 Br 12  (Ban et al., 2000). Therefore, when
                                                     Petsko, 1985; Kim et al., 1985; Holbrook and Kim,
        studying larger macromolecules it may be useful
                                                     1985; Garman and Murray, 2003). Historically, heavy
        to calculate the magnitude of the change in the
                                                     atoms have been grouped into class A and class
        diffraction signal before deciding which heavy atom
                                                     B elements based on their ligand preference. Class
        to try. Crick and Magdoff (1956) showed that the
                                                     A elements prefer ‘hard’ ligands such as carboxy-
        average fractional intensity change (∆I/I) for acen-
                                                     lates and other oxygen containing groups. These
        tric reflections can be estimated from the following
                                                     ligands are electronegative and form electrostatic
        equation:
                                                     interactions with the derivatives; they include the
                         1/2                         carboxylates of aspartic and glutamic acids and the
           ∆I/I = (2N H /N P )  (Z H /Z P )    (6)
                                                     hydroxyl of serine and threonine. On the other hand,
        where N H and N P are the number of heavy atoms  class B elements prefer ‘soft’ ligands such are those
        and non-hydrogen protein atoms, respectively; Z H  containing sulphur, nitrogen, and halides. These
        is the atomic number of the heavy atom and   include methionine, cysteine, and histidine. The lat-
        Z P is 6.7 (the average atomic number of protein  ter two amino acids are the most reactive amongst
        atoms).                                      all 20 naturally occurring amino acid residues. The
          In the case of small proteins, inspection of the  cysteine’s sulphur is an excellent nucleophile; it will
        amino acid composition can give valuable insights  reactirreversiblywithmercuricionsandorganomer-
        into which reagents should be tried first. For exam-  curials at wide range of pHs. The thiolate anion
        ple if the protein contains no free cysteines or  also forms stable complexes with class B metals,
        histidines it may be best to start soaking with com-  but since cysteines are almost totally protonated at
        pounds other than mercurials, or to genetically  pH 6 or below, this reaction is more sensitive to
        engineer heavy-atom binding sites as was done  pH than that with mercurials. The imidizole side
        with the catalytic domain of γδ resolvase (Abdel-  chain of histidine is also highly reactive, particu-
        Meguid et al., 1984; Hatfull et al., 1989). However,  larly above pH 6 where it is unprotonated. It reacts
        assuming a normal distribution of amino acids, one  well with reagents containing platinum, mercury,
        should begin with platinum compounds such as  and gold.
        K 2 PtC1 4 (the most widely successful heavy-atom  In addition to the amino acids described above,
        reagent), which binds mainly to methionine, his-  several other amino acid residues are also reac-
        tidine, and cysteine residues. Petsko et al. (1978)  tive toward compounds containing heavy atoms.
        have described the chemistry of this reagent in a  These are the side chains of arginine, asparagine,
        variety of crystal mother liquors. They also con-  glutamine, lysine, tryptophan, and tyrosine. Those
        cluded that most other platinum compounds react  that are not reactive are alanine, glycine, isoleucine,
   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106