Page 113 - Macromolecular Crystallography
P. 113

102  MACROMOLECULAR CRYS TALLOGRAPHY

        article by Urzhumtseva and Urzhumtsev (1997) and  that can be evaluated using FFT (Harada et al.,
        Protocol 7.2.                                1981; Stubbs and Huber, 1991) and this is avail-
          In Protocol 7.3 we show a typical command file  able in several MR packages, such as AMoRe
        for the AMoRe package (Navaza, 2001), one of the  (Navaza, 2001).
        most widely used packages for MR.


                                                     7.5 The need to find a better score for
        7.4 How does one know the solution           the rotation function: the Phaser
        has been found?                              euphoria
        Sometimes, it is not so easy to convince oneself that  Many people have recognized that the rotation
        the solution of the molecular replacement problem  function suffers from some drawbacks and have
        has, in fact, been found, even after rigid-body refine-  tried to improve the score by using origin-removed
        ment; indeed, the first solution is not always well  Patterson functions, normalized structure factors
        detached and different scores may produce different  E-values, etc. (Brünger, 1997).
        rankings. The most commonly used scores are corre-  Brünger and colleagues developed a ‘direct
        lation coefficients on either intensities or structure-  rotation function’, which is just a correlation coef-
        factor amplitudes, and R-factors. Even though these  ficient between E obs  and E mod (Omega), the normal-
        criteria are formally related (Jamrog et al., 2004),  ized structure factors of the crystal and of the rotated
        they can produce different rankings, especially if no  model, respectively. However, in this case the model
        solution is clearly detached. Some other criterion is  is placed in a P1 cell of dimensions and angles iden-
        then needed to discriminate between the potential  tical to the ones of the crystal being studied. This
        solutions.                                   works well but requires quite a lot of cpu as it is not
          One possibility is to run simulated annealing  amenable to FFT (DeLano and Brünger, 1995).
        refinement in torsion angle space as implemented in  Another idea is to use different runs of the same
        CNS (Brünger et al., 1998). As this is one of the most  program with slightly different models; it is most
        powerful programs in terms of radius of conver-  aptly described as an application of a ‘consistency
        gence, it is especially useful to look for the decrease  principle’, namely it is required that the solution
        of the free-R-factor (Adams et al., 1999), but this is a  should appear consistently in all runs, even with
        rathercpu-intensivetaskifseveralpossiblesolutions  a rather low score. Special algorithms have been
        are to be tested.                            developed to cluster similar solutions in eulerian
          In difficult cases, there is actually a way to  angles space and convincing results have shown
        bring the R-work and R-free down by means other  that it is indeed possible to increase the signal-
        than just rigid-body or dihedral angle molecular  to-noise ratio of the rotation function in this way
        dynamics, while still exploring just a few degrees  (Urzhumtsev and Urzhumtseva, 2002).
        of freedom, using the Normal Mode Analysis pro-  Recently, Read extended the maximum likelihood
        tocol (Delarue and Dumas, 2004). This is imple-  formalism to the molecular replacement problem.
        mented in http://lorentz.immstr.pasteur.fr and will  Maximum likelihood puts on analytical grounds the
        be described in the paragraph on ‘exploring struc-  notion that the best model is the one which maxi-
        tural diversity’ below (Lindahl et al., 2006).  mizes the probability of having measured the actual
          Another possibility is to look at the packing  experimental data at hand (structure factors). In
        of the top 10 solutions, because this can prove  his first implementation (BEAST), Read could show
        a very discriminating criterion. Even if the solu-  that he would get a much clearer signal in difficult
        tion is well detached, it is still mandatory (and  cases, but the program was pretty slow (Read, 2001).
        reassuring) to examine carefully the corresponding  Recently, he and his team developed a much more
        packing arrangement. This necessary (but not suf-  rapid version of his algorithm (PHASER), based on
        ficient) condition can actually be implemented in  an approximation which can be evaluated by FFT,
        the translation function using analytical expression  and this was incorporated in a single package that
   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118