Page 150 - Macromolecular Crystallography
P. 150

APPLICATION OF DIRECT METHODS  139

          In order to choose the enantiomorph, sets of  9.7 From substructure to protein
        protein phases must be computed from the set of
                                                     Once the proper enantiomorph has been found, the
        heavy-atom sites found by direct methods and vali-
                                                     substructure determination is complete, and the first
        dated by occupancy refinement as well as the set of
                                                     of the two stages of protein phasing – the one in
        sites related to the first set by inversion. Electron-
                                                     which direct methods plays a role – is finished. The
        density maps must be generated for both sets of
                                                     second stage involves substructure/protein phase
        phases and examined for the presence of biologically
                                                     refinement, includingthedeterminationofoptimum
        correct stereochemistry. If no anomalous dispersion
                                                     values for scaling, positional, and thermal param-
        data are available, this is the only option. However,
                                                     eters as well as expected lack-of-closure estimates
        if anomalous scattering measurements are included
                                                     and protein phases. Next, solvent flattening can be
        when the maps are computed, it is possible to use
                                                     used to bring about further phase improvement. In
        other criteria to select the enantiomorph automati-
                                                     automated programs such as BnP, these steps can be
        cally. For example, in BnP protein-solvent envelope
                                                     combined with the preceding substructure determi-
        masks are created for each map using a protein–
                                                     nation, and the entire process run as a single job in
        solvent boundary determination algorithm (Wang,
                                                     favourable cases. The resulting protein phases are
        1985), and then the standard deviations of the elec-
                                                     then available for export to graphics programs such
        tron densities in the protein and solvent regions are
                                                     as O (Jones et al., 1991) for manual examination of
        computed as well as the ratio σ(protein)/σ(solvent).
                                                     protein models or to programs such as ARPwARP
        This ratio should be higher for the correct enan-
                                                     (Morris et al., 2003) and RESOLVE (Terwilliger, 2003)
        tiomorph since atomic sites and gaps between chains
                                                     for automated chain tracing.
        within the protein region are expected to show large
        variations whereas solvent regions should be rel-
        atively flat with little variation. In practice, this  Acknowledgment
        ratio is a robust discriminator even when challenged
                                                     The preparation of this chapter was supported by
        deliberately by solutions having both missing and
                                                     NIH grant EB002057.
        false sites, and prior substructure or phase refine-
        ment is not a requirement (Weeks et al., 2002). The
        results of applying this enantiomorph determina-  References
        tion criterion to the 1JC4 example are shown in
        Table 9.9. It should be noted that the standard devia-  Adams, P. D., Gopal, K., Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W., Hung,
                                                      L.-W., Ioerger, T. R., McCoy, A. J., et al. (2004). Recent
        tion ratio defined here is similar to, but not identical
                                                      developments in the PHENIX software for automated
        to, criteria used in the programs SOLVE (Terwilliger
                                                      crystallographic structure determination. J. Synchrotron
        and Berendzen, 1999) and SHELXE (Sheldrick,
                                                      Rad. 11, 53–55.
        2002).                                       Baggio, R., Woolfson, M. M., Declercq, J. P., and
                                                      Germain, G. (1978). On the application of phase relation-
                                                      ships to complex structures. XVI. A random approach to
        Table 9.9 Enantiomorph discrimination for protein maps based
                                                      structure determination. Acta Crystallogr. A 34, 883–892.
        on the Se sites for 1JC4 trial 5
                                                     Bhuiya, A. K. and Stanley, E. (1963). The refinement of
                                                      atomic parameters by direct calculation of the minimum
        Enantiomorph  σ(solvent)  σ(protein)  σ(pro)/σ(sol)
                                                      residual. Acta Crystallogr. 16, 981–984.
        Original     18.65    30.18     1.62         Blessing,  R. H. and Smith,  G. D. (1999).  Differ-
        Alternate    23.08    27.14     1.18          ence structure-factor normalization for heavy-atom or
                                                      anomalous-scattering substructure determinations. J.
        The σ values are a measure of the electron-density variation in the protein  Appl. Cryst. 32, 664–670.
        and solvent regions, and the ratio of these numbers is a measure of the  Bricogne, G., Vonrhein, C., Flensburg, C., Schiltz, M.
        ‘contrast’ between the two regions. Since anomalous dispersion data were  and Paciorek, W. (2003). Generation, representation and
        used to phase the maps, the map for the correct hand will show greater
        contrast. In this case, the original direct-methods sites give rise to greater  flow of phase information in structure determination:
        contrast thereby indicating that these sites do correspond to the correct  recent developments in and around SHARP 2.0. Acta
        enantiomorph.                                 Crystallogr. D 59, 2023–2030.
   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155