Page 123 - Managing Global Warming
P. 123

Electricity generation in the world of nuclear power industry      93

           also dependent on the capacity factor. The higher the capacity factor—the better, as
           generating costs fall proportionally. However, some renewable energy sources with
           exception of large hydroelectric power plants can have significantly lower capacity
           factors compared to those of thermal and nuclear power plants. Consequently, in
           today’s politico-socio-economic world, many governments subsidize selected low-
           capacity factor sources, like wind and solar, using preferential rates, enforced portfo-
           lios, artificial tariffs, market rules, and power purchase agreements to partly offset the
           competitive advantage of lower cost generation from natural gas, coal, and nuclear. It
           is against the market background, of low cost natural gas and of directly or indirectly
           subsidized alternates, that today’s and tomorrow’s NPPs must operate. Levelized/
           relative cost of electricity from various energy sources in United States, Germany,
           and Ontario (Canada) is listed in Tables 3.5–3.7.
              Also, it should be noted here that countries having a large percentage of variable
           power sources, such as wind and solar, run the risk of an electrical grid collapse due to
           unpredicted power instabilities. Moreover, the following detrimental factors are



                                                                   a
            Table 3.5 Projected levelized cost of electricity (LCOE)
            in United States by 2020 (as of 2015) [23]
                                                            Projected LCOE (USD
                                                                per MWh)
                                                           Min     Ave    Max
            No.   Power-generating technology
            1     Geothermal                               43.8    47.8   52.1
            2     Natural gas (NG) advanced combined cycle  68.6   72.6   81.7
            3     Wind onshore                             65.6    73.6   81.6
            4     Natural gas (NG) conventional combined cycle  70.4  75.2  85.5
            5     Hydro                                    69.3    83.5   107.2
            6     Conventional coal                        87.1    95.1   119
            7     Advanced nuclear                         91.8    95.2   101
            8     Natural gas (NG) advanced combined cycle with  93.3  100.2  110.8
                  carbon capture and storage (CCS)
            9     Biomass                                  90      100.5  117.4
            10    Natural gas (NG) advanced combustion turbine  94.6  113.5  126.8
            11    Integrated coal-gasification combined cycle  106.1  115.7  136.1
                  (IGCC)
            12    Solar photo-voltaic (PV)                 97.8    125.3  193.3
            13    Natural gas (NG) conventional combustion turbine  107.3  141.5  156.4
            14    Integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC)  132.9  144.4  160.4
                  with carbon capture and storage (CCS)
            15    Wind offshore                            169.5   196.9  269.8
            16    Solar thermal                            174.4   239.7  382.5

            a
             The LCOE is a measure of a power source, which attempts to compare different methods of electricity generation on a
            comparable basis. It is an economic assessment of the average total cost to build and operate a power-generating asset
            over its lifetime divided by the total energy output of the asset over that lifetime. The LCOE can also be regarded as the
            minimum cost at which electricity must be sold in order to break even over the lifetime of the project.
   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128