Page 119 - Managing Global Warming
P. 119

Electricity generation in the world of nuclear power industry      89



            Table 3.4 Average (typical) capacity factors of various power
            plants [19] (for US data, see [20])

                                                                   Capacity
            No.  Power plant type          Location       Year     factor (%)
            1    Nuclear (Fig. 3.5)        United States  2016     93
                                           Russia         2014     81
                                           World          2015     82
            2    Geothermal (Fig. 3.13)    United States  2016     74
            3    Bioenergy                 United States  2016     47–70
                                           United Kingdom  2015    68
            4    Combined cycle            United States  2016     56
                                           United Kingdom  2015    32
            5    Coal fired (Fig. 3.4)     United States  2016     53
                                           United Kingdom  2015    39
            6    Hydroelectric (Figs. 3.6–3.9)  United States  2016  38
                                           United Kingdom  2015    41
                                           World          2011–13  30–55
            7    Wind (Figs. 3.10 and 3.12)  United States  2016   35
                                           United Kingdom  2015    34
                                           World          2011–13  20–40
            8    Concentrated solar thermal  United States  2016   22
                 (Figs. 3.15–3.17)         Spain (molten  2014     63
                                           salt with storage)
            9    PV solar (Fig. 3.20)      United States  2016     27
                                           United Kingdom  2015    12
            10   Wave (Fig. 3.22)          United Kingdom  2015    3




              quasipolitically determined emissions total or target, and currently are bought and sold at a
              price, say typically, $10–$20 per ton of carbon. Because these schemes are not globally
              uniformly adopted, the consequent embedded or hidden added cost of emissions causes
              power market distortions that may affect investment, generating mix, and industrial
              competitiveness.
           (g) The perceived or actual return on investment and investor/customer risk exposure is sen-
              sitive to adverse future regulatory changes, the potential for project cost overruns, adverse
              power market conditions, and ensuring return on investment (ROI) via long-term contracts
              for difference or power purchase agreements. The presence or extent of explicit or implicit
              government price guarantees, construction subsidies or loans, or long-term commitments
              also determine strategic investments, and generally favor short-term and/or low-risk
              projects that therefore need to carry little “risk margin” or added interest rate “adders.”
           This intertwined confluence of market forces, political policies, and resource avail-
           ability means that electricity energy price and market share is sometimes largely deter-
           mined by national and local considerations.
              Twoexamplesofhowvariousenergysourcesgenerateelectricityinagridcanbeillus-
           trated based on the Province of Ontario (Canada) system. Fig. 3.23A shows installed
   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124