Page 117 - Managing Global Warming
P. 117

Electricity generation in the world of nuclear power industry      87



            Table 3.2 Seventeen top power plants of the world by installed
            capacity [17]

                                                    Av. annual  Capacity
                                           Capacity  generation  factor  Plant
            No  Plant          Country     (MW el )  (TWh)     (%)       type
            1   Three Gorges   China       22,500   93.5       47        Hydro
                Dam (Fig. 3.6A)
            2   Itaipu Dam     Brazil/     14,000   103.1      84        Hydro
                               Paraguay
            3   Xiluodu        China       13,860   55.2       46        Hydro
            4   Guri Dam       Venezuela   10,200   47         52        Hydro
            5   Tucurui Dam    Brazil      8370     21.4       30        Hydro
            6   Kashiwazaki-   Japan       7965     (60.3)     (86)      Nuclear
                Kariwa (not in
                service)
            7   Grand Coulee   USA         6809     20.2       34        Hydro
                Dam
            8   Xiangjiaba     China       6448     30.7       54        Hydro
            9   Longtan Dam    China       6426     17.3       31        Hydro
            10  Sayano-        Russia      6400     27         48        Hydro
                Shushenskaya
            11  Bruce (Fig. 3.5)  Canada   6384     47.6       85        Nuclear
            12  Kori           South Korea  6040    39.3       74        Hydro
            13  Krasnoyarsk    Russia      6000     23         44        Hydro
                Dam
            14  Hanul          South Korea  5881    48.2       94        Nuclear
            15  Hanbit         South Korea  5875    47.6       92        Nuclear
            16  Nuozhadu Dam   China       5850     23.9       47        Hydro
            17  Zaporizhia     Ukraine     5700     48.2       97        Nuclear



           (b) The generating price advantage for any given source determines the market share only in
              truly competitive markets. Therefore, for electrical generators in power markets controlled
              by central decisions or government policies (e.g., India, Korea, and Russia), other consid-
              erations such as national energy security and national investment priorities affect generat-
              ing market share.
           (c) The political environment may favor selecting noncarbon sources over concerns on poten-
              tial Climate Change. Power-pricing tools may lead to preferential grid “feed in” or gener-
              ating tariffs, allocating a “portfolio” or market share, or offering selective investment
              incentives, and altering the operating “merit order” so that low-cost generators may even
              be paid not to produce.
           (d) The presence of regional or national Trade Treaties (e.g., the NAFTA in North America,
              or EU-Russia import policies) may allow energy preferential terms in or between certain
              partners, in addition to power grid interlinkages or gas pipelines and their routing.
           (e) The advances in generating technology efficiency, safety improvements, and emissions
              reduction may be subsidized by governments. Indirect methods and tools include national
   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122