Page 276 -

REFERENCES 265

Spender, J.-C. (1998). Pluralist epistemology and the knowledge-based theory of the firm. Organi-
zation, 5(2), 233–256.
Standish Group (2007). CHAOS Report: The laws of Chaos. Standish Group International Inc.
Star, S. L. and Griesemer, J. (1989). Institutional ecology, translations and boundary objects:
Amateurs and professionals in Berkley’s Museum of Vetebrate Zoology 1907–1939. Social
Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420.
Starbuck, W. (1992). Learning by knowledge-intensive firms. Journal of Management Studies,
29(6), 713–740.
Stoner, J. (1968). Risky and cautious shifts in group decision: The influence of widely held values.
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4, 442–459.
Suchman, L. (1987). Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human/Machine Communication.
Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Swan, J. (2007). ‘Knowledge’ entry in James R. Bailey and Stewart Clegg (Eds). International
Encyclopedia of Organization Studies. London: Sage Publications, Vol. 2.
Swan, J. (2008). ‘Knowledege’ entry in S. Clegg and J. R. Bailey (Eds). International Encyclopedia
of organization Studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 750–755.
Swan, J. and Clark, P. (1992). Organizational decision-making in the appropriation of technological
innovation: Cognitive and political dimensions. European Work and Organizational Psychologist,
2, 103–127.
Swan, J. and Newell, S. (1995). The role of professional associations in technology diffusion. Orga-
nization Studies, 16(5), 847–874.
Swan, J. and Scarbrough, H. (2005). The politics of networked innovation. Human Relations.
58(7), 913–943.
Swan, J., Newell, S. and Robertson, M. (1999a). Central agencies in the diffusion and design of
technology: A comparison of the UK and Sweden. Organization Studies, 20, 905–932.
Swan, J., Newell, S. and Robertson, M. (1999b). The illusion of best practice in information systems
for operations management. European Journal of Information Systems, 8, 284–293.
Swan, J., Scarbrough, H. and Robertson, M. (2002). The construction of ‘communities of practice’
in the management of innovation. Management Learning, 33(4), 477–496.
Swan, J., Scarbrough, H. and Robertson, M. (2003). The construction of ‘communities of practice’
in the management of innovation. Management Learning, 33(4), 477–496.
Swan, J., Bresnen, M., Newell, S. and Robertson, M. (2007a). The object of knowledge: The role
of objects in interactive innovation. Human Relations, 60(12), 1809–1837.
Swan, J., Goussevskaia, A., Newell, S., Robertson, M., Bresnen, M. and Obembe, A. (2007b) Modes
of organizing biomedical innovation in the UK and US and the role of integrative and relational
capabilities. Research Policy, 36(4), 529–547.
Taylor, F. W. (1911). The Principles of Scientific Management. New York: Harper.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G. and Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management.
Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.
Thompson, J. (1967). Organizations in Action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Thompson, M. (2005). Structural and epistemic parameters in Communities of Practice. Organiza-
tion Science, 16(2), 151–164.
Thompson, M. and Heron, P. (2006). Relational quality and innovative performance in R&D based
science and technology firms. Human Resource Management Journal, 16, 28.
Tidd, J., Bessant, J. and Pavitt, K. (1997). Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological Market
and Organizational Change. Chichester: Wiley.
Tseng, S. (2007). The effects of information technology on knowledge management systems. Expert
Systems with Applications, 35(1–2), 1–11.

6/5/09 7:22:38 AM
9780230_522015_12_ref01.indd 265 6/5/09 7:22:38 AM
9780230_522015_12_ref01.indd 265