Page 411 - Marine Structural Design
P. 411

Chapter 20 Spectral Fatigue Analysis and Design                        387

                                                                    y,Lx





                                                                    0





                                                                  :F




                            Figure 20.4  S-N Classification of Structural Details

                 If concerns remain about the use of a cope hole, it is possible to improve its fatigue strength by
                 cutting back  and  grinding the weld  end as shown in  Figure 20.3. In  such cases, the weld
                 between the flange and web should be full penetration over the regions on either side of the
                 cope hole in order to avoid failure through the weld throat (W class).
                 Figure 20.4 illustrates the third example of  S-N classification of structural details. It’s the
                 small bracket between the pontoon and the base node in a TLP structure. Based on the UK
                 DEn (1990) Guidelines and published fatigue test data, the hotspot areas can be classified as F
                 or F2.
                 S-N classification of the structural details in floating structures is a challenging task. During
                 the design process, there are many structural details, which cannot be classified based on the
                 UK  DEn  (1990) guidelines. In  this  case,  other  design  standards such  as AWS  (1997) or
                 published fatigue test data may be used to justify the classification.

                 20.5.4  Fatigue Damage Assessment
                 The fatigue life of structural details is calculated based on the S-N curve approach assuming
                 linear cumulative damage (Palmgren-Miner rule). A spectral fatigue analysis is used where the
                 long term stress range distribution is defined through a short term Rayleigh distribution within
                 each short-term period for different wave directions. A one-slope or bi-linear S-N curve may
                 be assumed.
                 Fatigue lives  are  determined by  the  service  life  and  safety factors. Additional margin  is
                 desirable due to the uncertainties associated with fatigue assessment procedures.
                 Initial Hotspot Screening
                 The objective of the initial screening is  to  identify the  fatigue critical areas based on the
                 experience and the in-service data. Fatigue damage is calculated for each element in the group
                 assuming a conservative S-N curve and upper-bound SCF for each element. The calculated
                 damages are reviewed and all elements with fatigue lives less than the minimum required, are
                 analyzed in further detail in the specific hotspot analysis.
   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416