Page 659 - Mechanical Engineers' Handbook (Volume 2)
P. 659

650   Controller Design

                          variable or because it offers an inherent advantage related to feedback dynamic character-
                          istics. Usually, there are advantages and disadvantages of using alternative feedback loops,
                          as illustrated in the following example.
                             Consider an electrohydraulic position servo that has rather demanding requirements for
                          dynamic response. Suppose that envelope or environmental constraints make it very difficult
                          to mount velocity and acceleration transducers or that the mounting arrangement itself in-
                          troduces undesirable higher order dynamics. In this case, consideration might be given to
                          transducing cylinder differential pressure in place of the velocity or acceleration feedbacks.
                          If the load can be represented as primarily a mass, cylinder pressure will be proportional to
                          load acceleration. If cylinder or load friction is large, it may be necessary to use a load cell
                          rather than a pressure transducer. However, the load is often more complex than a simple
                          mass. For example, the load might also have substantial stiffness to ground and viscous
                          damping. In this case, cylinder pressure would have components proportional to load accel-
                          eration, velocity, and position. If these components were of the proper relative size and not
                          highly variable, a pressure transducer alone could replace the acceleration and velocity trans-
                          ducers. However, if the load dynamics were complex or highly variable, the use of cylinder
                          pressure as an inner loop might do more harm than good.
                             Another potential problem associated with the use of alternative inner feedback 1oops
                          is the influence of external disturbances. Consider again the example of the electrohydraulic
                          position servo. Feedback of either velocity or acceleration will have no effect on closed-loop
                          static stiffness because, by definition, all derivatives of position are zero in the steady state.
                          However, an external force applied to the load will change the cylinder pressure, even in the
                          steady state. Therefore, pressure feedback will reduce closed-loop stiffness unless the pres-
                          sure feedback signal is high passed, which introduces its own set of dynamic characteristics.
                          Of course, there are applications in which closed-loop stiffness is not critical in the first
                          place.
                             It should also be mentioned that the mounting of the primary transducer can introduce
                          its own dynamic peculiarities. For example, the controlled variable might be load position
                          relative to ground, and the transducer might be integrally mounted within the servoactuator
                          assembly. If there were substantial compliance in the structure to which the actuator is
                          mounted, the position feedback loop would contain structural zeros. An integral velocity
                          transducer would have the same problem, but a load-mounted accelerometer would not. In
                          this case and in others where the derivative feedback loops are dynamically different from
                          one another, the simplified techniques of Section 4.1 are of limited use, and the complete
                          multiloop model must be analyzed directly. Again it should be noted that these more complex
                          derivative feedback loops may result in better or poorer closed-loop performance than com-
                          parable inner 1oops that feed back pure derivatives of the controlled variable. Proper as-
                          sessment of these trade-offs requires a good physical model of the system, showing the
                          proper relationships of all the feedback variables being considered.



           4.3  Nonelectronic Inner Loops
                          Occasionally, it is useful to implement inner loop feedbacks by mechanical design rather
                          than electronic means. For example, it may be possible to mount the servoactuator or primary
                          transducer so that structural deflections under load produce favorable feedback zeros that
                          improve closed-loop damping. In an electrohydraulic servo, improved damping can often be
                          obtained by using hydraulic pressure feedback, implemented with a cross-port orifice or
                          laminar leakage path. Both of the schemes will suffer loss of closed-loop stiffness. Sometimes
                          it is possible to mount an electrohydraulic servoactuator so that its rod attaches to the mount-
   654   655   656   657   658   659   660   661   662   663   664