Page 127 - Mechanics of Asphalt Microstructure and Micromechanics
P. 127

Experimental Methods to Characterize the Heterogeneous Strain F ield   119



                   e x         e y         e z         e xy        e xz        e yz
                 0.004       0.012       0.0038      0.0034      0.0109       0.023
              TABLE 4.5  Macro-strain for one tetrahedron.

                 Figure 4.18 shows the Y direction strain contour of the center section of the rutted
              area. In Figure 4.18, along the Y-axis of the specimen from the top to the bottom, obtain
              the macro strain value e g  in every 10 mm. Then the total deformation of Y direction can
                                Σ
              be calculated as ΔY =  e g  dY = 6.1mm, which is close to the macro-deformation result
              obtained from APA test, 6.38 mm. The difference might be caused by the image resolu-
              tion and image processing. Figure 4.19 shows the Y direction strain contour of the edge
              section of the rutted area. Using the same deformation measurement method as for the
              center-rutted area, the deformation for the edge-rutted area is 0.02 mm. The rutted pro-
              file, obtained from experiment and measurement, is compared in Figure 4.20.

              FIGURE 4.18  Y-direction  80.00
              strain of center-rutted area.
                                      70.00

                                      60.00
                                      50.00

                                      40.00
                                      30.00
                                           30.00  40.00  50.00  60.00  70.00  80.00
              FIGURE 4.19  Y-direction  80.00
              strain contour of edge-rutted
              area.
                                      70.00

                                      60.00
                                      50.00

                                      40.00

                                          30.00  40.00  50.00  60.00  70.00  80.00
              FIGURE 4.20  Comparison of
              experimental and measured
              rutted data.
   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132