Page 377 - Mechanics of Asphalt Microstructure and Micromechanics
P. 377

Simulation of  Asphalt Compaction   369


                 If the compaction process is viewed as a process where air-voids are reduced and
              particles are re-oriented, the mathematical representation of the air-void reduction pro-
              cess (Equation 11-1) can be conveniently derived from Figure 11.2.
                                         A =  A + K •  LogN                      (11-1)
                                                    l
                                           v   v0
                 where A v0  = air-void content after the first gyration;
                                                  th
                       A v  = air-void content after the N  gyration;
                        l
                       K  = slope of lab compaction, or the rate of air-void content reduction.
              (A v  − A v0 ) corresponds to the accumulative volumetric strain. In a 1D case it is also the
              vertical strain.
                 In other words, if density is the only parameter of interest (density may not be the
              only parameter for performance), Equation 11-1 is a mathematical model. It is necessary
              to associate the model parameters A v0  and K  with other material properties such as ag-
                                                  l
              gregate characteristics, gradation, binder content, and binder properties (temperature
              dependent). However, it should be noted that the current gyratory compaction proce-
              dure uses a constant pressure. How compaction varies with the magnitude of the pres-
              sure may need further exploration in order to associate lab compaction to field com-
              paction because field compaction has a varying pressure to different volume elements
              (the AC in a layer feels a varying pressure when the compactor moves). Figure 11.3 il-
              lustrates this difference, where the three volume elements may be subjected to different
              levels of stress or compactive efforts. If compaction curves at different compactive ef-
              forts can be acquired in the lab, through calculating the compactive energy transferred
              to the different elements in the field, the compaction levels at different locations can be
              evaluated. This presents a logical reasoning to tackle the problem, although the math-
              ematic models may take different formats.
                 The A v  ~ LogN consolidation relationship is not unique to AC. Figure 11.4 presents
              the consolidation process of a soil, which is well known to civil engineers. Obviously,
              soil consolidation (e-log p) is very similar to the consolidation/compaction of  AC.
              A further interpretation of the soil consolidation curve was provided by Wang and Frost
              (2004) to transfer this curve (e-log p) space to the E d -p (dissipated strain energy-effective










                 Field compaction may                              Elements at
                 have a vibratory                                  different depths are
                 component. The stresses                           subjecting to
                 subjected may be similar                          different
                 to half sine process.                             magnitudes of
                                                                   loading.


              FIGURE 11.3  Illustration of the loading difference of volume elements in fi eld compaction.
   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382