Page 391 - Mechanics of Asphalt Microstructure and Micromechanics
P. 391

Simulation of  Asphalt Compaction   383


           0.15                                     0.15
                                          5:1                                      5:1
                                          1:1                                      1:1
            0.1                           1:2        0.1                           1:2
          VVF                                      VVF
           0.05                                     0.05

             0                                        0
              0  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10 11 12   0  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10 11 12
                           Passage                                  Passage
                                (a)                                                                     (b)

                                                      0.15
              FIGURE 11.17  Change of VVF along                                    5:1
              passages for different soil/AC stiffness                             1:1
              ratios at (a) bottom, (b) mid height and (c)   0.1                   1:2
              top of the AC layer.
                                                     VVF
                                                      0.05

                                                       0
                                                         0  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10 11 12
                                                                     Passage
                                                                             (c)
                  •  The optimum compaction passages, compaction pressure, or the thickness of
                    the compaction layer could be determined based on compaction simulations.
                  •  Stiffer sub-base material will lead to more effective compaction of the AC layer
                    above.
                  •  The effect of the stiffness of the base/sub-base on the compaction is greater at
                    the bottom of the AC layer than at the top.
                  •  If the stiffness of the base/sub-base material is smaller than the stiffness of the
                    AC layer during compaction, it may cause compaction problems.
                 These results indicate that the model and FEM simulation of compaction can be
              used to evaluate factors affecting compaction. With good calibration, the model may
              capture the compaction characteristics well.
                 Other unique models that can be used for modeling compaction include a model
              developed by Tashman et al., (2007). This model introduces one aggregate orientation
              parameter and the modified effective stress concept. However, this particle orientation
              parameter can be only a constant or static in that model. There is no evolution law to
              govern the change of this parameter during compaction. The modified effective stress
              is adopted from granular mechanics where there is no other constraint except particle-
              particle contact. The model developed by Wang et al. (2003) is a mixture-theory-based
              model. Although it includes void as a component, it does not involve repetitive loading.
              Therefore, it can be used in modeling static loading only.
                 The above evidence indicates that viscoplasticity models can be used to model the
              compaction process. The model parameters such as the elasticity modulus, the yielding
              stress, and other parameters are related to the binder stiffness, aggregate gradation,
   386   387   388   389   390   391   392   393   394   395   396