Page 395 - Mechanics of Asphalt Microstructure and Micromechanics
P. 395

Simulation of  Asphalt Compaction   387


              compactibility of asphalt concrete and developed the R f  factor as defined in the fol-
              lowing equation.
                                        P  − R τ     04 .
                                   R =  LD   tcb ⎛  h⎞  [N.mm.sec]              (11-19)
                                                n
                                                  v⎠
                                                 ⎝
                                     f     η     ⎜ ⎟
                                            m
                where P = weight of the roller (N)
                      L = width of the roller drum (mm)
                      D = diameter of the roller drum (mm)
                      R t  = roller type factor (dimensionless)
                                                                 2
                     t cb  = shear cohesion of bituminous mixtures (N/mm )
                     h m  = viscosity of the compacted mixture (poise)
                      n = number of roller passes
                      h = thickness of asphalt layer (mm)
                      v = speed of the compactor (mm/s)

                 Vizi (1981) also used this approach to evaluate compactibility.

        11.5  Microscopic Study of Lab Compaction Process

              11.5.1  Void Distribution and Variation Using XCT
              A more recent systematic study at the microscopic level on lab compaction methods
              including Marshall, Gyratory, and LCPC rolling-wheel-compactor (RWC) has been
              achieved by Partl et al. (2007a, 2007b). In this study, specimens of the same mix were
              compacted using the above compaction methods at the initial, medium, and final com-
              paction. The void distribution in these mixes was evaluated using computerized to-
              mography. Its discoveries include: 1) the void reduction in the Marshall compaction is
              almost linear; LCPC RWC is non-linear and the gyratory compaction is somewhere
              between; 2) the void distribution within the specimen is non-uniform; and 3) there is
              significant lateral movement of the mixtures during the RWC compaction. The struc-
              turally different specimens produced in each of the compaction methods indicate that
              these methods may not be able to produce specimens whose structure is similar to
              those produced in the field.

              11.5.2 Other Experimental Studies
              Masad et al. (2002) studied the gyratory compaction process using XCT. They analyzed
              the void distributions of the gyratory specimens and discovered that void contents at
              both the bottom and top of the specimens are much higher than the void content at the
              middle. In that investigation, compaction energy and the dissipation process were also
              investigated.


        11.6  Perspective on Gradation Effect Representation
              In applied research, empirical representation of compatibility is highly practical to ma-
              terial and paving engineers. Development of these formulations will help practicing
              engineers to assess the compactibility of a mix conveniently. While Section 11.4 presents
   390   391   392   393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400