Page 275 - Mechanism and Theory in Organic Chemistry
P. 275

Carbenes  263

      alkyl groups in the olefin, demonstrate that the methylenes and carbenoids are in
      practice strong electrophiles. Reactivity  of carbenoids is  lower  with  the highly
      substituted olefins, a  result of steric hindrance considered  to  be  evidence  that
      they are not free ~arbenes.l~~
          A structure with unshared pairs of electrons adjacent to the carbene center
      (65) should  be much  less electrophilic.  Although systems of this type have  not
      been  thoroughly  investigated,  the  available  evidence  indicates  that  they  have
      reduced  ele~trophi1icity.l~~












                                                                            A
          A second question posed by the olefin additions is one of stereochemistry. -
      --
      concerted  ring  formation  of  the  type  shown  in  Equation  5.35  implies  stereo-
      specific cis adgtkn, a suggestion first made in 1956 by Skell and Woodw~rth.~~~






      With  a  triplet  carbene,  however,  the  spin  state  of  one  of  the  electrons  must
      change before bonding can be completed; if this process takes long enough for
      rotation to occur about bonds in the intermediate, a mixture of products should
      result (Scheme 10).171 It should be pointed out that this argument is not without
      flaw; the singlet is not required to react stereospecifically simply because it can,

                                   ,                     4 CH,
           1  1       1                 p   2        1   /
         ;C-C-     + 1 CH,  + ;C-C-        + ;C-C-          +
       R     R '                R     R  '       R      R .      R









      lee See note  167.
      leg (a) U.  Schollkopf and E. Wiskott, Angew. Chem. Znt.  Ed., 2, 485  (1963) ; (b) D. Seebach,  Angew.
      Chem. Znt.  Ed., 6, 443 (1967) ; see also (c) R. Gleiter and R. Hoffmann, J. Amer. Chem. Sac.,  90, 5457
      (1968); (d) H. J. Schonherr and H. W. Wanzlick, Chem. Ber.,  103,  1037 (1970).
        (a) See note  163(b); (b) R.  Hoffmann, J. Amer. Chem. Sac.,  90,  1475 (1968), argues on the basis
      of orbital symmetry that the approach cannot be symmetrical, and that the  :CH,  must initially  be
      closer to one end of  the olefin  than  to  the other;  the one-step stereospecific  nature of  the addition
      is not affected by  this argument.
      lT1 R. Hoffmann,  note  170(b), gives  a  more  rigorous discussion  of  the  additions  and reaches  the
      same conclusions regarding stereochemistry.
   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280