Page 138 - Mechatronics for Safety, Security and Dependability in a New Era
P. 138

Ch25-I044963.fm  Page 122  Tuesday, August 1, 2006  3:36 PM
            Ch25-I044963.fm
               122
               122    Page 122 Tuesday, August 1, 2006  3:36 PM

               Se = ^  x SV x (SPe + SDe)                                            (6)
                   SI
               Le      LV(LP  + LD)                                                  (7)
               Se: EB of spindle lubricant oil [kg-GAS]  Le: EB of slide way lubricant oil [kg- GAS]
               SRT: Spindle runtime in an NC program [s]  SV: Discharge rate of spindle lubricant oil [L]
               57: Mean interval between discharges [s]  SPe: EB of spindle lubricant oil production  [kg-GAS/L]
               SDe: EB of spindle lubricant oil disposal  [kg-GAS/L]
               LUT: Slide way runtime in an NC program  [s] LI: Mean interval between supplies [s]
               LV: Lubricant oil quantity supplied to slide way [L]
               LPe: EB of slide way lubricant oil production  [kg-GAS/L]
               LDe: EB of slide way lubricant oil disposal  [kg-GAS/L]

               Cutting tool (Te)
               Cutting  tools  are managed  from  the view  point  of tool  life.  So, the tool  life  is compared  with the
               machining  time  to  calculate  the  environmental  burden  in  one machining.  Also,  the cutting  tools,
               especially  for solid  end mill,  are made  a recovery  by re-grinding,  so these  points  are considered to
               construct environmental burden equation.

               Te =  - ^  ?x((TPe + TDe)x.TIV + RCNxRCe)                              (8)
               MT: Machining time [s]               TL: Tool life [s]
               TPe: EB of cutting tool production  [kg- GAS /kg]  TDe: EB of cutting tool disposal  [kg- GAS /kg]
               TW: Tool weight [kg]                 RN: Total number of recovery
               RCe: EB of tool recovery [kg- GAS]

               Metal chip {CHe)
               Metal chips are recycled to material by an electric heating furnace.  This materialization process has to
               be considered. This kind of  equation is supposed to consider material kind, but an electrical  intensity
               of  this  kind  of electric  heating  furnace  is  represent  by kWh/t,  so the equation  constructed  in this
               research is calculated  from the total metal chip weight.

               CHe = (WPV-PV)xMDx  WDe                                               (9)
               WPV: Work piece volume [cm ]        PV: Product volume [cm ]
                                              3
               MD: Material density of work piece  [kg/cm ]  WDe: EB of metal chip processing  [kg-GAS/kg]


               CASE  STUDY
               In  order  to  show  the feasibility  of developed  system,  a  case  study  is introduced.  Then,  the impact
               category is set to global  warming to calculate the environmental  burden.  In this  research, CO 2,  CH 4
               and N2O are evaluated based on Japanese data, which are decided from  environmental report, technical
               report,  home  page  and industrial  table  (Tokyo  Waterworks,  2002,  Tokyo  Electric  Power  Company,
               2002, Nansai, 2002, Mizukami,  2002). Here, CH 4 and N2O emission  is converted to equivalent CO2
               emission  using  the characterization  factors  and total  CO 2 emission  is  evaluated.  Here,  the  global
               warming potential  (GWP) of 100 years (IPCC,  1995) is used for the characterization  factors. The other
               emission  matters  related  to  global  warming  are ignored,  because  there  are no emissions  about the
               machining  operations. In this case  study, machine  tool is MB-46VA  (OKUMA  Corp.), cutting tool is
               carbide square end mill with 2 flutes and 30 deg. helical  angle and workpiece is medium carbon  steel
               (S50C). The simple product  shown in Figure 2 is evaluated.
   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143