Page 232 - Mechatronics for Safety, Security and Dependability in a New Era
P. 232

Ch44-I044963.fm  Page 216  Tuesday, August 1, 2006  4:00 PM
            Ch44-I044963.fm
               216
               216    Page 216  Tuesday, August  1, 2006  4:00 PM
               worst  rule  for  storages.  That  means  the  best  rule  from  view  point  of  total  manufacturing  system
               might not be the  best for  each area. Conversely, the  best rale at an area might not be the global  best
               rule. It is important  to  evaluate the global manufacturing  system  for  cutting total  product  cost. All
               costs  in  assembly  line  are the  same.  We consider  that  the  initial  inventory  level  of parts  storage  is
               enough to absorb the fluctuation  of parts arrival from  processing areas. Those facts  also suggest the
               importance of evaluating total manufacturing  system.

               Product  costs  of  4  days  are  listed  in  Table  3  and  6  days  are  listed  in  Table  4.  As  shown  in  these
               tables,  total  best  rule  is  varied  at  end  of  4  days.  This  fact  shows  the  difficulty  to  select the  most
               important  criterion  from  time  and  quantity  based  criteria.  In  other  words,  the  advantage  of  cost
               criterion is shown through the experiments.

                                     Table 2  Product Cost of Day  1 am 2
                                                HC      EDD      SPT
                                 Processing A  566,149  566,149  566,149
                                 Processing B  1,210,868  1,231,775  1,231,775
                                Assembly Line  527,166  527,166  527,166
                                  Storages    2,933,024  2,931,088 2,932,017
                                    Total     5,237,207  5,256,178  5,257,107

                                    Table 3  Accumulated Product Cost of 4 days
                                                HC      EDD      SPT
                                 Processing A  1,286,396  1,259,266  1,259,277
                                 Processing B  2,897,404 2,836,145 2,927,244
                                Assembly Line  976,833  979,033  978,333
                                  Storages    4,808,301  4,820,264 4,813,092
                                    Total     9,968,934  9,894,708 9,977,946
                                    Table 4  Accumulated Product Cost of 6 days
                                              HC       EDD       SPT
                               Processing A  1,959,670  1,959,649  1,959,670
                               Processing B  3,943,778  3,943,778  3,943,778
                               Assembly Line  1,748,700  1,748,700  1,748,700
                                 Storages   6,936,707  6,943,103  6,943,182
                                  Total     14,588,855  14,595,730  14,596,330


               5.  GENETIC ALGORITHM BASED APPROACH
               To  reduce  product  cost  more  aggressively,  we  propose  another  algorithm  based  on  Genetic
               Algorithm. In this approach, product cost is estimated as the fitness value.
               5. /.  Objective System
               In this  experiment,  we  implement  the  algorithm  to  Processing  A.  As  shown  in Figure  4, there  are
               four HMCs and three VMCs  in Processing A. We assume that MRP system  sends order messages to
               this  area  every  day  and  the  detail  schedules  are  composed  in  this  area.  All  materials  for  order
               messages are stocked  in Material  Storage. In this area, 20 kinds of materials  are processed. Material
               1-5  are processed  only on HMCs, material 6-10 are processed  only on VMCs and material  11-20 are
               processed  on HMCs and VMCs.
   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237