Page 200 - Media Effects Advances in Theory and Research
P. 200

7. MASS MEDIA ATTITUDE CHANGE                                  189

        central and peripheral route processes can lead to attitudes similar in their
        valence (how favorable or unfavorable they are), there are important con-
        sequences of the manner of attitude change such that more thoughtful
        attitude changes tend to be more consequential than less thoughtful ones.
           If the goal of a mass media influence attempt is to produce long-lasting
        changes in attitudes with behavioral consequences, the central route to per-
        suasion appears to be the preferred persuasion strategy. If the goal is imme-
        diate formation of a new attitude, even if it is relatively ephemeral (e.g., atti-
        tudes toward the charity sponsoring a telethon), the peripheral route may
        prove acceptable. Influence via the central route requires that the recipient
        of the new information have the motivation and ability to process it. As
        noted previously, one of the most important determinants of motivation to
        think about a message is the perceived personal relevance of that message.
        Most of the media messages people receive are probably not perceived as
        directly relevant, and they have few immediate personal consequences.
        Thus, many of these messages will be ignored or processed primarily for
        peripheral cues. An important goal of any persuasion strategy aimed at
        enduring change will be to increase people’s motivation to think about the
        messages by increasing the perceived personal relevance of the communi-
        cations or employing other techniques to enhance processing (e.g., ending
        arguments with questions rather than statements; using multiple sources).
           In conclusion, we note that research on mass media persuasion has come
        a long way from the early optimistic (and scary) notion that the mere pre-
        sentation of information was sufficient to produce persuasion and the sub-
        sequent pessimistic view that media influence attempts were typically inef-
        fective. We now know that media influence, like other forms of influence, is
        a complex, though explicable, process. We know that the extent and nature
        of a person’s cognitive responses to external information may be more
        important than the information itself. We know that attitudes can be
        changed in different ways, such as central versus peripheral routes, and
        that some attitude changes are more accessible, stable, resistant, and predic-
        tive of behavior than others. We also know that even apparently simple
        variables such as how likable a source is or what mood a person is in can
        produce persuasion by very different processes in different situations.


                                  REFERENCES

        Aaker, J. L., & Maheswaran, D. (1997). The effect of cultural orientation on persuasion.
           Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 315–328.
        Adams, C. (1993, April 7). The power of the media. Michigan Chronicle, p. A7.
        Ajzen, I. (1988). Attitudes, personality, and behavior. Chicago: Dorsey Press.
        Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Deci-
           sion Processes, 50, 179–210.
        Alba, J. W., & Marmorstein, H. (1987). The effects of frequency knowledge on consumer
           decision making. Journal of Consumer Research, 13, 411–454.
   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205