Page 202 - Media Effects Advances in Theory and Research

7. MASS MEDIA ATTITUDE CHANGE 191

Chaiken, S., & Eagly, A. H. (1976). Communication modality as a determinant of message
persuasiveness and message comprehensibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psy-
chology, 34, 605–614.
Chaiken, S., Liberman, A., & Eagly, A. H. (1989). Heuristic and systematic processing
within and beyond the persuasion context. In J. Uleman & J. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended
thought (pp. 212–252). New York: Guilford Press.
Chaiken, S., & Maheswaran, D. (1994). Heuristic processing can bias systematic process-
ing: Effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude
judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 460–473.
Chaiken, S., & Trope, Y. (Eds.). (1999). Dual-process theories in social psychology. New York:
Guilford Press.
DeBono, K., & Harnish, R. (1988). Source expertise, source attractiveness, and the pro-
cessing of persuasive information: A functional approach. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 55, 541–546.
DeBono, K., & Packer, M. (1991). The effects of advertising appeal on perceptions of prod-
uct quality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 194–200.
DeSteno, D., Petty, R. E., Wegener, D. T., & Rucker, D. D. (2000). Beyond valence in the
perception of likelihood: The role of emotion specificity. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 78, 397–416.
Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled compo-
nents. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5–18.
Doob, L. (1935). Propaganda, its psychology and technique. New York: Holt.
Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt
Brace Jovanovich.
Evans, L. M., & Petty, R. E. (1998, May). The effect of expectations on knowledge use. Presented
at the annual meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago.
Fazio, R. H. (1990). Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: The MODE
model as an integrative framework. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social
psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 75–109). New York: Academic Press.
Fazio, R. (1995). Attitudes as object-evaluation associations: Determinants, consequences,
and correlates of attitude accessibility. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude
strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 247–282). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earl-
baum Associates.
Fazio, R. H., & Williams, C. J. (1986). Attitude accessibility as a moderator of the attitude-
perception and attitude-behavior relations: An investigation of the 1984 presidential
election. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 505–514.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to
theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Fiske, S. T., & Pavelchak, M. A. (1986). Category-based versus piecemeal-based affective
responses: Developments in schema-triggered affect. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Hig-
gins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior
(pp. 167–203). New York: Guilford Press.
Forgas, P. (1995). Mood and judgment: The affect infusion model (AIM). Psychological
Bulletin, 117, 39–66.
Frey, D. (1986). Recent research on selective exposure to information. In L. Berkowitz
(Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 41–80). San Diego, CA:
Academic Press.
Friedrich, J., Fetherstonhaugh, D., Casey, S., & Gallagher, D. (1996). Argument integration
and attitude change: Suppression effects in the integration of one-sided arguments
that vary in persuasiveness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 179–191.
Gillig, P. M., & Greenwald, A. G. (1978). Is it time to lay the sleeper effect to rest? Journal
of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 132–139.