Page 52 - Membranes for Industrial Wastewater Recovery and Re-Use
P. 52

32  Membranes for Industrial Wastewater Recovery and Re-use


           velocity of  the rotor is around 10-1 5 m s-l, depending on the diameter of  the
           membrane  cell.  Both  the  VSEP  and  CR  ultrafiltration  processes  have  been
           successfully applied to liquors of  high suspended solids content (Sections 3.2.5
           and 5.6), achieving concentrate streams in excess of 5% solids in some cases.
             Other turbulence promotion modifications to modules are still largely at the
           developmental  stage.  These  include  intermittent  jets,  in  which  the  feed  is
           pumped coaxially through a membrane tube at fixed intervals through a nozzle.
           The abrupt change in velocity produces a toroidal vortex, increasing the flux by
           up to 2.5 times for granular suspensions such as bentonite clay (Arroyo and
           Fonade, 1993). Pulsed flow has also received much attention (Gupta et al., 1985,
           1992; Rodgers and Sparks, 1993; Bertram et al.,  1993). In this mode, pulses of
           flow  are  generated  in  the  feed  or  permeate  channel,  again  creating  large
           temporal changes in the velocity gradient. A simpler alternative for turbulence
           promotion  is  the  use  of  simple  inserts  in  tubes.  This  is  also  not  practised
           commercially, despite the many publications in this area, as reviewed by Gupta
           etal. (1995), Belfort etal. (1994) andothers.
             Finally,  a  process  that  has  significantly  extended  the  capability  of
           electrodialysis  is  the  electrodeionisation  (EDI),  also  called  continuous
           deionisation (CDI), process commercialised by Vivendi Ionpure and Ionics. In
           this  process  the  diluate  cells  of  the  electrodialysis stack  are  filled  with  ion
           exchange resin beads. The resin effectively aids the transport of  ions from the
           diluate to the concentrate cells by providing a conducting pathway. This results
           in extremely effective removal of all charged species in the diluate cell, producing
           a product water of  a quality comparable to that from a twin-bed deionisation
           process but offering the advantage of being continuous.



           2.2  The process fundamentals



           2.2.1 Process performance definitions


           Flux
           The key elements of  any membrane process are the influence of  the following
           parameters on the overall permeateflux:

             0  the membrane resistance,
             0  the operational driving force per unit membrane area,
             0  the hydrodynamic conditions at the membrane-liquid  interface, and
             0  the fouling and subsequent cleaning of the membrane surface.

             The flux is the quantity of material passing through a unit area of membrane
           per unit time. This means that it takes SI units of m3 mP2 s-l, or simply m s-l,
           and is occasionally referred to as the permeate velocity. Other non-SI units used
           are 1 m-2  h-’  (or “LMH”) and m3 per day, which tend to give more accessible
   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57