Page 165 - Methods For Monitoring And Diagnosing The Efficiency Of Catalytic Converters A Patent - oriented Survey
P. 165

Hitachi Ltd.                           I47



                   converter therein, and  a high  pass filter. The microcomputer is operated in  accordance with
                   stored software for achieving functions of the above mentioned means such as auto-correlation
                   tinction calculating means and the catalytic converter deterioration determining means.

                   The  auto-correlation  bnction  of  the  output  signal  from  the  upstream  oxygen  sensor  is
                   calculated by  an  auto-correlation function  calculating means.  The  cross-correlation function
                   between  the  output  signal  x  of the upstream  oxygen  sensor and  an  output  signal  y  of  the
                   downstream oxygen sensor is calculated  by the cross-correlation tinction calculating means.

                   Determination of  whether or  not  the  catalytic converter has  deteriorated is  carried  out  by
                   catalytic  converter  deterioration  determining  means,  which  calculates  a  successive
                   deterioration index and compares the calculated index with a predetermined  reference value.
                   Determination as to whether or not the upstream oxygen sensor deteriorates is made by aidtiel
                   ratio sensor deterioration determining means.


                   In  the  method  of  DE4209136 (1992) and  US5237818 (1993) the  catalytic  converter
                   conversion efficiency is estimated by comparing a correlation function @(T)  computed from the
                  output signals of the upstream and downstream sensors with a reference value.

                  Figs. 68a,d show the variation in time of the output signals of the upstream and  downstream
                  sensors respectively, when the aidfuel feedback control of fig. 68c is imposed on the engine.
                  Figs.  68b,e  show  the  corresponding binary  code  signals (rectangular waves) generated  by
                  comparing the output  signals of figs. 68a,d to the comparison levels  EI  and  EZ  respectively.
                  Level  equals a mean value of the maximum and minimum values of the wave of the upstream
                  airltiel ratio. The value of the comparison level   is based on a characteristic of the upstream
                  aidtiel  sensor.  Symbols y  and  z  (figs. 68b.d)  denote  an  interval  in  which  the  correlation
                  function is  calculated. The  region  I containing the  space where a  rectangular wave  is  not
                  generated is put equal to a fixed interval of the feedback coefficient of the air/fhel ratio.

                  The correlation function is then calculated byy and z as follows:







                  where,
                   .f, , .f2:  functions of time, such as the input and output of a communication system,
                  r : a time delay parameter
                  1' : is a time interval

                  The correlation function @,  is calculated as
   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170