Page 194 - Microaggressions in Everyday Live Race, Gender, and Sexual Orientation
P. 194

168  gender microaggressions and sexism

               While these arguments were bogus, they provided convenient rationalizations
               for not voting for the ERA.


                   Modern Sexism: Invisibility, Good Intentions, and Control

                 Just as the opponents of the ERA manifested many of the characteristics of mod-
               ern sexism (invisibility, good intentions, but ultimately control of women),
               manifestations of sexism have evolved over time into a more subtle and
               insidious form (Swim, Aiken, Hall,  &  Hunter, 1995). Although not overt and
               intentional, these subtler forms of sexism nevertheless exert power over
               women and ultimately control their social, psychological, economic, and
               political opportunities in life (Swim  &  Cohen, 1997). Modern sexism is char-
               acterized by denial of personal bias and prejudice toward women, a general
               conscious belief in equality of the sexes, but unconscious attitudes that foster
               nonsupport for programs and legislation helpful to women. Modern sexism is
               likely to operate outside the level of conscious awareness through false belief
               systems that allow for discriminatory treatment:  “ Discrimination against


               women is a thing of the past. ”   “ Men and women now have an equal oppor-


               tunity to succeed in society. ”   “ Women have no right to be angry as they have

               already advanced far in our society. ”   “ Women are no longer disadvantaged;

               indeed it is men who are being discriminated against. ”  These beliefs serve to
               mask hostility toward equality for women.
                    A different but related form of modern sexism is  benevolent sexism  as opposed
               to  hostile sexism ; the former is composed of traditional stereotypes about
               women, yet they are viewed positively, while the latter evokes negative atti-
               tudes linked to beliefs about female inferiority (Glick  &  Fiske, 1996). Both
               share similar stereotypes of women, but benevolent sexists are motivated
               paternalistically to  “ protect the weaker sex, ”  view them as objects of  “ romantic
               love, ”  and admire them as  “ wives and mothers. ”  Despite viewing women
               positively, it is based on an idealized stereotyped perception of the opposite
               sex and is equally controlling and harmful.
                   In Chapter  1 , we used the example of a female subway rider who was
               jostled while trying to exit at her stop. A stranger saw her plight and without
               her permission physically interceded by placing his hand on the small of her
               back and escorting her out. The man no doubt thought he was being pro-
               tective, helpful, and chivalrous, but the woman passenger felt uncomfortable

               receiving his help. He would be identified as a benevolent sexist, who conveyed
               a  sex - role  stereotype of women as the weaker sex, needing protection, and









                                                                                    1/20/10   2:42:10 PM
          c08.indd   168                                                            1/20/10   2:42:10 PM
          c08.indd   168
   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199