Page 344 - MODERN ELECTROCHEMISTRY
P. 344

280 CHAPTER 3







                The physical significance of    is that at very low concentrations the ion
            atmosphere has such a large radius compared with that of the ion that one need not
            consider the ion as having a finite size a. Considering   is tantamount to
            reverting to the point-charge model.
                One can now proceed rapidly to compare this theoretical expression for   with
            experiment; but what value of the ion size parameter should be used? The time has
            come to  worry about  the  precise  physical meaning of the  parameter a that  was
            introduced to allow for the finite size of ions.

            3.5.4.  The Ion Size Parameter a
                One  can  at first  try to  speculate on  what value of the ion  size  parameter is
            appropriate. A lower limit is the sum of the crystallographic radii of the positive and
            negative ions present in solution;  ions cannot come closer than this distance [Fig.
            3.31 (a)]. But in a solution the ions are generally solvated (Chapter 2). So perhaps the
            sum of the solvated radii should be used [Fig. 3.3 l(b)]. However when two solvated
            ions collide, is it not likely [Fig. 3.31 (c)] that their hydration shells are crushed to some
            extent? This means that the ion size parameter a should be greater than the sum of the
            crystallographic radii and perhaps less than the sum of the solvated radii. It should best
            be called the mean distance of closest approach, but beneath the apparent wisdom of
            this term there lies a measure of ignorance. For example, an attempted calculation of
            just how crushed together two solvated ions are would involve many difficulties.
                To circumventtheuncertainty in the quantitativedefinition ofa, it is bestto regard
            it as a parameter in Eq. (3.120), i.e., a quantity the numerical value of which is left to
            be calibrated or adjusted on the basis of experiment. The procedure (Fig. 3.32) is to
            assume that the expression for log  [Eq. (3.120)] is correct at one concentration, then
            to equate this theoretical expression to the experimental value of log  corresponding
            to that concentration and to solve the resulting equation for a. Once the ion size
            parameter, or mean distance of closest approach, is thus obtained at one concentration,
            the value can be used to calculate values of the activity coefficient over a range of
            other and higher concentrations. Then the situation is regarded as satisfactory if the
            value of a obtained from experiments at one concentration can be used in Eq. (3.120)
            to reproduce the results of experiments over a range of concentrations.

            3.5.5.  Comparison of the Finite-Ion-Size Model with Experiment

                After taking into account the fact that ions have finite dimensions and cannot
            therefore be treated as point charges, the following expression has been derived for
            the logarithm of the activity coefficient:
   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349