Page 115 - Modern Spatiotemporal Geostatistics
P. 115

96       Modern  Spatiotemporal  Geostatistics —  Chapter 4


        which  expresses  the  obvious  fact  that  given  that  the  data  vector  Xdata(^)
        has  been  observed—as  the subscript ^ in  Equation  4.5 indicates—its  prob-
        ability  is  one.  On  the  other  hand,  at  the  prior  stage  it  is  usually  valid  that
        Prob ff[x dota(5)]  <  1.  Furthermore,  we have  the  following  relation  between
        conditional  probabilities




             Equation 4.6 simply means that the evidential impact of X data(S}  on Xk  IS
        already  fully  assessed in  assigning  the  prior  conditional  probability  and,  hence,
        the fact that Xdat a(<$)  actually  occurred  is no reason to  change this assessment.
        [In  other  words,  Equation  4.6  means  that  the  probability  we assign  to \ k
        assuming  that Xdata(S)  will turn out to  be true is equal to the  probability we
        would  assign  to Xk  on  learning that Xdata(^)  indeed  turned out to  be true.]
            By the  definition  of conditional  probability





        which  in light of  Equation  4.5  gives




            Taking Equation 4.6 into account,  Equation 4.8 yields the Bayesian  con-
        ditionalization  principle




        which  is  the  desired  result.  [This  principle,  in  fact,  was  responsible  for  the
        first  letter  in the  acronym  "BME,"  originally  used to  name the spatiotemporal
        mapping approach;  Christakos,  1990.]  In light of  Equation  4.9,  the  mathemat-
        ical  form  of  Prob^  is obtained  from  that  of  Prob $  by fixing Xdata(^)  as tne
        conditioning factor.



        COMMENT  4.5 : Equation   4-4   ma y b e given  th e following   interpretation
        in terms   of   the   random   field   complementarity   idea   that   was   discussed   in

         Chapter 2  (p.  58):  IfXdata(S)  does  indeed  entail  x k> thenx map(^} occurs  in


                                                          s
        every X-realization   in   which \ data(S) occurs.   But   ifXk   ^   neither entailed


         by Xdata(^}   nor    inconsistent  with   it,  then   Xmap(S)  occurs  only  in   some of

        the possible X-realizations in which Xdata(S) occurs,  ('i.e., those  realizations




                     a
                      so

        in which   Xk ^   happens   to   occur).   Therefore,   we   may   take   the   ratio   of


        the quantity   o f random   fiel d realizations   i n which  Xmap(-5) occurs   to th e










        quantity o f realizations  in which  Xdota(^) occurs  as determining  th e extent

        to which Xdata(S) entails  Xk   an<  ^> thus,   defining   the   probability ofx k  given


        Xdata^}} namely Prob^XfelXdataC^)]- **>ee a^so the discussion in the section

        on conditional  probability on p.  98.
   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120