Page 159 - Modern Spatiotemporal Geostatistics
P. 159

140       Modern  Spatiotemporal  Geostatistics —  Chapter 7

            Estimating  the  value  of  the  variable at  p k  is  equivalent  to  solving  the
        BMEmode   of  Equation  7.6, which  in this case  reduces to











        where the integration is over the range [xiiX:;] °f tne s°ft datum. After the
        evaluation  of  the  partial  derivatives  and the  substitution  of  the c^'s  from
        Equation  7.13, Equation  7.14  gives








        The  desired  BMEmode  estimate  Xk  is  obtained  as the  solution  to  Equation

            As  was  mentioned  in  previous chapters,  BME  formalism  is very general,
        and  one has considerable freedom in choosing covariance, variogram,  and gen-
        eralized  covariance models.  Homogeneous/stationary  or  nonhomogeneous/
        nonstationary,  separable or  nonseparable, etc.  models can  be  used  depending
        on  one's  understanding  of  the  basic  features of  the  problem  (see also  "Spa-
        tiotemporal  Covariance and Variogram  Models"  in  Chapter  11, p. 224). The
        next  numerical example is concerned with the  effect of  incorporating  skewness
        into the  mapping  calculations.
        EXAMPLE 7.3: Based upon the  spatiotemporal  hard data configuration  of Fig-
        ure 7.1, x^(Pfe)"rea''zat'ons (^ = 1> • • • > 1000) were generated assuming the
        same statistics  as in  Example 12.7 (p. 238). For each one of  these realizations,
        the BMEmode estimate         was obtained at pointpk, assuming various
        skewness  values (i.e.,  0,2,3,  and 3.5) as prior  knowledge.  Then,  the  corre-
        sponding estimation  errors
        were calculated.  The  pdf's  of these estimation  errors are plotted  in  Figure 7.2.
        The  error pdf's  change considerably as the  skewness values vary, thus showing
        the  importance in estimation accuracy of the  skewness values incorporated by
        BME.
            Furthermore,  Bogaert  et al.  (1999)  have suggested a computational  tech-
        nique that  incorporates into BME analysis information  available about the non-
        Gaussian  shape  of  the  univariate  pdf  of  the  random field.  This technique  in-
        volves  a  suitable  transformation  of  the  posterior  pdf  to  the  Gaussian  space.
        Then,  the  pdf  is back-transformed to  the  original  space  using a smoothed es-
        timate of the  transformation.
   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164